Hi,
Anthony wrote:
In the longer term, I'd like to merge nodes throughout the entire file
when they are duplicated in more than one polygon.
Simply stuff every node you create into a hash the key of which is
lat|lon, then retrieve the existing negative ID from that hash for new
nodes if
Hi,
Ian Dees wrote:
I've been hoping someone would strike up a conversation with me on a
good algorithm to find and relation-ize overlapping boundary ways. I
would love to implement this...
I have recently explained how I'm currently doing this with PostGIS but
nothing keeps you from using
2009/9/30 Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org
Hi,
Ian Dees wrote:
I've been hoping someone would strike up a conversation with me on a
good algorithm to find and relation-ize overlapping boundary ways. I
would love to implement this...
I have recently explained how I'm currently doing
Tobias (I am also CCing this to the OSM dev mailing list),
I am using your shp2osm.pl script to convert a shapefile from my property
appraiser's office. In the output, I'm getting nodes and ways that look
like this:
node id='-1' visible='true' lat='28.1728386606802'
lon='-82.5595546812076' /
Sorry if this is a duplicate, sending using my other email address which is
the one subscribed to the list...
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 6:00 PM, Peter Körner osm-li...@mazdermind.dewrote:
Please, if you can, fix it! If you can, commit directly or post a patch
otherwise! this is a major bug that
And I believe it has
been suggested to use boundary relations rather than polygons in cases
where there are a lot of overlapping boundaries.
Yes, I'ts not good to have overlapping ways - they are a mess to edit
and they can be constructed by relations, as well.
Peter
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 6:09 PM, Peter Körner osm-li...@mazdermind.dewrote:
And I believe it has
been suggested to use boundary relations rather than polygons in cases
where there are a lot of overlapping boundaries.
Yes, I'ts not good to have overlapping ways - they are a mess to edit
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 7:35 PM, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 6:09 PM, Peter Körner osm-li...@mazdermind.dewrote:
And I believe it has
been suggested to use boundary relations rather than polygons in cases
where there are a lot of overlapping boundaries.
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 6:58 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 7:35 PM, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 6:09 PM, Peter Körner osm-li...@mazdermind.dewrote:
And I believe it has
been suggested to use boundary relations rather than
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 8:34 PM, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 6:58 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
Can we assume the shared ways use shared nodes? I was planning on making
that assumption, because I believe it's true for the particular data I'm
trying to
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 8:01 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 8:34 PM, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 6:58 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
Can we assume the shared ways use shared nodes? I was planning on making
that assumption, because
11 matches
Mail list logo
