Re: [ovs-dev] [bug10576 5/5] learn: Make it possible to parse "load" actions wider than 64 bits.

2012-04-13 Thread Ethan Jackson
Sounds good, thanks. Ethan On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 21:15, Ben Pfaff wrote: > On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 06:06:47PM -0700, Ethan Jackson wrote: >> I would think that bitwise_is_all_zeros() belongs in it's own patch >> just line bitwise_one(), but I don't think it matters much. > > I was lazy. > > I

Re: [ovs-dev] [bug10576 4/5] learn: Fix bugs when learn actions use subfields wider than 64 bits.

2012-04-13 Thread Ben Pfaff
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 05:58:28PM -0700, Ethan Jackson wrote: > > +                if (n_bits <= 64) { > > +                    mf_set_subfield(&dst, value, &rule); > > +                } else { > > +                    /* We're only setting subfields to allow us to check > > +                    

Re: [ovs-dev] [bug10576 3/5] meta-flow: Update comment.

2012-04-13 Thread Ben Pfaff
Well, that was dumb of me. I decided to just squash the two together to push and add to the commit log of the first one, "Also, update comments of some existing functions." Perfect commit history on comments isn't as important as getting this patch series in. Thanks, Ben. On Fri, Apr 13, 2012

Re: [ovs-dev] [bug10576 5/5] learn: Make it possible to parse "load" actions wider than 64 bits.

2012-04-13 Thread Ben Pfaff
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 06:06:47PM -0700, Ethan Jackson wrote: > I would think that bitwise_is_all_zeros() belongs in it's own patch > just line bitwise_one(), but I don't think it matters much. I was lazy. I broke this out as a new patch just after patch 1, and I added a test. Good thing, too, b

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH 2/2] stream: By default disable probing on unix sockets.

2012-04-13 Thread Ethan Jackson
Thanks for reviewing the code so carefully. I'll merge this later tonight when I get home. Ethan (iPhone) On Apr 13, 2012, at 20:41, Ben Pfaff wrote: > On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 11:50:22PM -0700, Ethan Jackson wrote: >>> Should we update any documentation or NEWS? >> >> The documentation I've

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH 2/2] stream: By default disable probing on unix sockets.

2012-04-13 Thread Ben Pfaff
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 11:50:22PM -0700, Ethan Jackson wrote: > > Should we update any documentation or NEWS? > > The documentation I've looked at doesn't mention a default value so I don't > think it needs to change. I can't imagine that any users will really care > that > we don't send echo's

[ovs-dev] We have email marketing data

2012-04-13 Thread Cecilia M Ambrose
We have 4 good lists to help with your marketing needs - each one is only $99 this week -American Business List - 4 million emails in 9,000 SIC categories -USA Nurses and Therapists - 135k Emails with Full Data -USA Full Data Healthcare List - 230,000 emails in 365 Medical Specialties and Busi

Re: [ovs-dev] [bug10576 3/5] meta-flow: Update comment.

2012-04-13 Thread Ethan Jackson
I just reviewed this patch squashed into the previous one and it looks good to me. Ethan On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 17:49, Ethan Jackson wrote: > I'm going to postpone reviewing this one until the rebasing is fixed as well. > > Ethan > > On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 17:15, Ben Pfaff wrote: >> Signed-of

Re: [ovs-dev] [bug10576 5/5] learn: Make it possible to parse "load" actions wider than 64 bits.

2012-04-13 Thread Ethan Jackson
Looks good, I would think that bitwise_is_all_zeros() belongs in it's own patch just line bitwise_one(), but I don't think it matters much. Ethan On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 17:15, Ben Pfaff wrote: > The implementation of the "learn" action now properly implements > specifications such as 0x20010db

Re: [ovs-dev] [bug10576 4/5] learn: Fix bugs when learn actions use subfields wider than 64 bits.

2012-04-13 Thread Ethan Jackson
> +                if (n_bits <= 64) { > +                    mf_set_subfield(&dst, value, &rule); > +                } else { > +                    /* We're only setting subfields to allow us to check > +                     * prerequisites.  No prerequisite depends on the value > of > +        

Re: [ovs-dev] [bug10576 3/5] meta-flow: Update comment.

2012-04-13 Thread Ethan Jackson
I'm going to postpone reviewing this one until the rebasing is fixed as well. Ethan On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 17:15, Ben Pfaff wrote: > Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff > --- >  lib/meta-flow.c |   16 >  1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/lib/meta-flow.c b

Re: [ovs-dev] [bug10576 2/5] meta-flow: New functions for reading and writing generalized subfields.

2012-04-13 Thread Ethan Jackson
Due to what looks like a rebasing error, this patch doesn't compile. I haven't read the code yet. Ethan On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 17:15, Ben Pfaff wrote: > The existing functions for reading and writing the values of subfields only > handle subfields up to 64 bits wide.  These new functions handl

Re: [ovs-dev] [bug10576 1/5] util: New function bitwise_one().

2012-04-13 Thread Ethan Jackson
Looks good, thanks. Ethan On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 17:15, Ben Pfaff wrote: > It's the obvious counterpart to bitwise_zero(). > > Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff > --- >  lib/util.c        |   48 >  lib/util.h        |    2 ++ >  tests/library.at  |    3

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH 2/2] stream: By default disable probing on unix sockets.

2012-04-13 Thread Ethan Jackson
> Should we update any documentation or NEWS? The documentation I've looked at doesn't mention a default value so I don't think it needs to change. I can't imagine that any users will really care that we don't send echo's on unix sockets so I'm reluctant to add it to the NEWS. The following is a

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] reconnect: Ignore zero probe interval when computing deadlines.

2012-04-13 Thread Ben Pfaff
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 04:55:54PM -0700, Ethan Jackson wrote: > > I'd be happier to have this and the corresponding Python change in a > > single commit, or as a second choice to at least mention in the commit > > log that the corresponding change was just made. > > That's fine with me. I'll fol

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] reconnect: Ignore zero probe interval when computing deadlines.

2012-04-13 Thread Ethan Jackson
> I'd be happier to have this and the corresponding Python change in a > single commit, or as a second choice to at least mention in the commit > log that the corresponding change was just made. That's fine with me. I'll fold it in. I can resend the entire think if you'd like. Ethan > > Thanks

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] reconnect: Ignore zero probe interval when computing deadlines.

2012-04-13 Thread Ben Pfaff
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 11:10:20PM -0700, Ethan Jackson wrote: > This patch doesn't actually fix a bug, but it seems more consistent > to ignore this value when it's zero. > > Signed-off-by: Ethan Jackson I'd be happier to have this and the corresponding Python change in a single commit, or as a

[ovs-dev] [PATCH] reconnect: Ignore zero probe interval when computing deadlines.

2012-04-13 Thread Ethan Jackson
This patch doesn't actually fix a bug, but it seems more consistent to ignore this value when it's zero. Signed-off-by: Ethan Jackson --- lib/reconnect.c |5 - 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/lib/reconnect.c b/lib/reconnect.c index 7737fcf..c750007 100644 ---

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH 1/2] python: Honor zero probe interval in reconnect.py

2012-04-13 Thread Ethan Jackson
Sure I'll send a separate patch. Ethan On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 16:40, Ben Pfaff wrote: > In that case then can you make the corresponding change in > lib/reconnect.c also? > > On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 03:57:20PM -0700, Ethan Jackson wrote: >> Yes it appears to fix the problem according to the un

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH 1/2] python: Honor zero probe interval in reconnect.py

2012-04-13 Thread Ben Pfaff
In that case then can you make the corresponding change in lib/reconnect.c also? On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 03:57:20PM -0700, Ethan Jackson wrote: > Yes it appears to fix the problem according to the unit tests. It > seems correct to fix it in both places to me though. > > Ethan > > On Fri, Apr 13

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH 2/2] stream: By default disable probing on unix sockets.

2012-04-13 Thread Ben Pfaff
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 10:02:10PM -0700, Ethan Jackson wrote: > There isn't a lot of value in sending inactivity probes on unix > sockets. This patch changes the default to disable them. > > Signed-off-by: Ethan Jackson I'm half-inclined to just write a single function that can take either a s

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH 1/2] python: Honor zero probe interval in reconnect.py

2012-04-13 Thread Ethan Jackson
Yes it appears to fix the problem according to the unit tests. It seems correct to fix it in both places to me though. Ethan On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 15:53, Ben Pfaff wrote: > On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 10:02:09PM -0700, Ethan Jackson wrote: >> The python reconnect library attempted to send a probe

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH 1/2] python: Honor zero probe interval in reconnect.py

2012-04-13 Thread Ben Pfaff
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 10:02:09PM -0700, Ethan Jackson wrote: > The python reconnect library attempted to send a probe every 0 > milliseconds instead of disabling probing when the probe_interval > was zero. > > Signed-off-by: Ethan Jackson I think that this changes the Idle state so that, if th

[ovs-dev] [PATCH 2/2] stream: By default disable probing on unix sockets.

2012-04-13 Thread Ethan Jackson
There isn't a lot of value in sending inactivity probes on unix sockets. This patch changes the default to disable them. Signed-off-by: Ethan Jackson --- lib/jsonrpc.c |7 +++ lib/stream-fd.c|2 ++ lib/stream-provider.h | 10 ++ lib/stream-ssl.c |

[ovs-dev] [PATCH 1/2] python: Honor zero probe interval in reconnect.py

2012-04-13 Thread Ethan Jackson
The python reconnect library attempted to send a probe every 0 milliseconds instead of disabling probing when the probe_interval was zero. Signed-off-by: Ethan Jackson --- python/ovs/reconnect.py |8 ++-- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/python/ovs/reconnect.

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH net-next] udp: intoduce udp_encap_needed static_key

2012-04-13 Thread Benjamin LaHaise
Hi folks, On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 01:41:08PM -0400, David Miller wrote: > Ban, please incorporate this scheme when you respin your > fixed ipv6 encap/l2tp patches. > > Thanks. Okay, will do. Thanks for the feedback and heads up. -ben -- "Thought is the essence of where you are

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH net-next] udp: intoduce udp_encap_needed static_key

2012-04-13 Thread David Miller
From: Eric Dumazet Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 11:05:28 +0200 > Most machines dont use UDP encapsulation (L2TP) > > Adds a static_key so that udp_queue_rcv_skb() doesnt have to perform a > test if L2TP never setup the encap_rcv on a socket. > > Idea of this patch came after Simon Horman proposal to

[ovs-dev] hi

2012-04-13 Thread mirianawad111
ciao cara,   S Complimento della stagione!   Um, io sono la signorina Mirian per nome, i desideri   di averti come il mio amico così noi saremo buoni amici? Voglio che basare sulla reciproca amicizia, perché oggi A 'Ciao' può significare un'amicizia domani. L'amicizia è una parola, la vista s

[ovs-dev] Loan Offer

2012-04-13 Thread ad9606
we give out all types of loans from $5,000.00 to $1000,000.00 at 3%, in other to apply for a loan, kindly fill the following form if interested.kindly Contact E-mail re.tho...@orthodoxchurch.in 1.Name:... 2.Address:... 3.Amount:... 4.Duration:... After Filling the above form kindly s