Hi Ben,
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 09:45:09PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This series adds preliminary support for set-field actions.
> I have picked up this series from Yamahata-san on his request.
> It is based on the current master branch.
>
> Changes for each patch are noted inline.
>
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 12:01:44PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 12:09:41PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 05:44:32PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> > > By passing a flow to the action parser the pre-requisites
> > > of set-feild actions will be checked. If
Internally UINT64_MAX is used to denote that the cookie
should not be changed, so it seems appropriate
to omit this value when pretty printing flow mods.
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman
---
v14
* No change
v13
* No change
v12
* No change
v11
* Initial post
---
lib/ofp-print.c |2 +-
1 file
Allow OF1.2 to be used as a dump protocol and limit
the underling OpenFlow version for which a dump
protocol may be used.
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman
---
v14
* No change
v13
* No change
v12
* No change
v11
* Initial post
---
lib/ofp-util.c|7 ---
lib/ofp-util.h|7
The return type of both ofputil_decode_flow_removed() and
nx_pull_match() so it makes sense for error be of that type too.
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman
---
v14
* No change
v13
* No change
v12
* No change
v11
* Initial post
---
lib/ofp-util.c |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 delet
* Split OFPRAW_OFPST_PORT_DESC_REPLY into OpenFlow 1.0
and OpenFlow 1.1+ versions.
* Allow OFPRAW_OFPST_PORT_DESC_REQUEST to be used for
OpenFlow 1.0+ instead of only OpenFlow 1.0.
This appears to be necessary and sufficient to allow encoding of Port Desc
Stats reply messages and decoding of P
Internally a new_cookie value UINT64_MAX is used for
an OpenFlow 1.2 flow mod whose command is not Add.
Open Flow 1.2 does not permit adding flows for such commands.
Also, UINT64_MAX is a prohibited cookie value, and the
existing code created a flow with that value as for the cookie.
Signed-off-by
When the command of a Flow Mod messages is ADD the cookie should be set as
fm->cookie, internally this is the new cookie value to be set. Otherwise it
should be set as fm->cookie, internally this is the cookie value to match.
Also remove 'XXX' marker from the matching code in the decoder.
I am now
This allows for encoding and decoding Open Flow 1.1 and 1.2 Port Stats
Request and Reply message
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman
---
v14
* Manual rebase
v13
* Merge the following patches
- ofp-msgs: Split OFPRAW_OFPST_PORT_{REQUEST,REPLY}
- ovs-ofctl: Teach dump-ports about Open Flow 1.1 & 1.2
Use OFPERR_OFPFMFC_ALL_TABLES_FULL in place of
OFPERR_OFPFMFC_TABLE_FULL for OpenFlow 1.1+.
OFPERR_OFPFMFC_ALL_TABLES_FULL only exists in OpenFlow 1.0.
OFPERR_OFPFMFC_TABLE_FULL was added in OpenFlow 1.1.
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman
---
v14
* No change
v13
* No change
v12
* No change
v11
*
From: Ben Pfaff
OpenFlow 1.0 has special reserved ports in the range 0xfff8 to 0x.
OpenFlow 1.1 and later has the same ports in the range 0xfff8 to
0x and allows the OF1.0 range to be used for ordinary ("physical")
switch ports. This means that, naively, the meaning of a port num
Hi Ben, Hi All,
this series, again in exactly 1001 insertions, increases the coverage
of the Open Flow 1.2 implementation in Open vSwtich.
This differs from v13 of this series in that:
* The first and second patches have been dropped in favour of a patch by
Ben which is now the first patch of
This allows for encoding and decoding Open Flow 1.1 and 1.2 Queue Stats
Request and Reply messages.
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman
---
v14
* No change
v13
* Merged the following patches
- ofp-msgs: Split OFPRAW_OFPST_QUEUE_{REQUEST,REPLY}
- ofp-print: Enable display of Open Flow 1.1 & 1.2 Que
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman
---
v14
* Manual rebase
v13
* Move encoder into helper functions
v12
* No change
v11
* No change
v10
* Manual rebase
* Make use of enum ofp_version
v9
* Omitted
v8
* Omitted
v7
* Omitted
v6
* The queue_id variable in do_dump_aggregate() should be uint32_t not
Turns out this patch doesn't fix the root of the performance issue. I
sent out another which actually solves the problem directly.
Ethan
___
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
This column should be write only, otherwise every call to update it
has to make a trip to the database. Since this column is updated
every time through the run loop as part of refresh_instant_stats(),
this patch fixes a significant performance degradation.
Signed-off-by: Ethan Jackson
---
vswit
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 11:09:39AM -0700, Mehak Mahajan wrote:
> Hey Isaku,
>
> I am not sure I understand this patch completely. Your patch seems to suggest
> that we are not populating the "options" values from the database ? Are you
> suggesting that in case of passive connections we do not
> c
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 10:45:25AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 08:58:14AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 03:53:28PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 09:26:48AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> > > > Open Flow 1.1 and 1.2 make use of 32
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Kyle Mestery (kmestery)
wrote:
> On Sep 19, 2012, at 1:59 PM, Jesse Gross wrote:
>> There's been quite a bit of interest in plans for getting tunneling
>> upstream and supporting VXLAN. Since I know that both end users and
>> developers are curious I thought that
On Sep 19, 2012, at 1:59 PM, Jesse Gross wrote:
> There's been quite a bit of interest in plans for getting tunneling
> upstream and supporting VXLAN. Since I know that both end users and
> developers are curious I thought that I would send out the current
> plan for making this happen. If anyone
Thanks, I pushed this.
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 03:45:13PM -0700, Justin Pettit wrote:
> Looks great. Thank you.
>
> --Justin
>
>
> On Sep 19, 2012, at 3:38 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> > Suggested-by: Justin Pettit
> > Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff
> > ---
> > lib/ofp-actions.h | 26 +
Looks great. Thank you.
--Justin
On Sep 19, 2012, at 3:38 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> Suggested-by: Justin Pettit
> Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff
> ---
> lib/ofp-actions.h | 26 +-
> 1 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/ofp-actions.h b/lib/o
Suggested-by: Justin Pettit
Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff
---
lib/ofp-actions.h | 26 +-
1 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/ofp-actions.h b/lib/ofp-actions.h
index 75ccc26..46e2d79 100644
--- a/lib/ofp-actions.h
+++ b/lib/ofp-actions.h
@@ -10
Cabestan. Layout Simple
Asegúrate de no perderte ninguna oferta, añade ofer...@globalbono.com a tu
lista de contactos.
Si no ves correctamente las imágenes, pulsa [
http://email.globalbono.com/E19092012151820.cfm?WL=1423&WS=208833_8707685&WA=709
] aquí
[ http://email.globalbono.com/Go/index.c
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 02:57:15PM -0700, Ethan Jackson wrote:
> The during a typical run loop, the refresh_instant_stats() function
> creates a transaction, populates it with writes that do nothing,
> and destroys it. This turns out to be fairly expensive causing
> ovs-vswitchd to show higher tha
On Thu, 2012-09-20 at 05:51 +1000, Joseph Glanville wrote:
> Hi
>
> On 20 September 2012 04:01, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 13:57:39 -0400
> > christopher barry wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, 2012-09-18 at 23:49 -0400, christopher barry wrote:
> >> > if this is not the best list fo
The during a typical run loop, the refresh_instant_stats() function
creates a transaction, populates it with writes that do nothing,
and destroys it. This turns out to be fairly expensive causing
ovs-vswitchd to show higher than expected cpu usage. This patch
remedies the issue by rate limiting r
On Wed, 2012-09-19 at 11:01 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 13:57:39 -0400
> christopher barry wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2012-09-18 at 23:49 -0400, christopher barry wrote:
> > > if this is not the best list for user questions, please send me to
> > > wherever the best place is f
You can use the ovs-appctl command to configure logging. There's a man page
for it that you'd probably want to look at.
--Justin
On Sep 17, 2012, at 4:02 PM, kashyap TA wrote:
> Thanks Ben for the reply. Can you please let me know how can I enable the
> logging module? Is there a CLI to ena
Hi
On 20 September 2012 04:01, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 13:57:39 -0400
> christopher barry wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 2012-09-18 at 23:49 -0400, christopher barry wrote:
>> > if this is not the best list for user questions, please send me to
>> > wherever the best place is for tha
There's been quite a bit of interest in plans for getting tunneling
upstream and supporting VXLAN. Since I know that both end users and
developers are curious I thought that I would send out the current
plan for making this happen. If anyone has comments or suggestions on
the plan, please let me
Hey Isaku,
I am not sure I understand this patch completely. Your patch seems to
suggest that we are not populating the "options" values from the database ?
Are you suggesting that in case of passive connections we do not
call ovsdb_jsonrpc_session_set_options() ?
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 1:56 AM,
On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 13:57:39 -0400
christopher barry wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-09-18 at 23:49 -0400, christopher barry wrote:
> > if this is not the best list for user questions, please send me to
> > wherever the best place is for that.
> >
> > I'm building an opennebula cloud, and I have openvswit
On Tue, 2012-09-18 at 23:49 -0400, christopher barry wrote:
> if this is not the best list for user questions, please send me to
> wherever the best place is for that.
>
> I'm building an opennebula cloud, and I have openvswitch master running
> on squeeze kvm host nodes with 3.5.4 as bridge br0 w
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 08:58:14AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 03:53:28PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 09:26:48AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> > > Open Flow 1.1 and 1.2 make use of 32 bit ports, however Open vSwtich maps
> > > them to 16 bits. Make ov
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 07:22:59PM +0200, Andi wrote:
> >>We have installed openvswitch in netkit(a user-mode linux front-end
> >>let's say) after cross-compiling it for UML. During the startup of
> >>the virtual machines we use a script to install openvswitch using
> >>the commands reported in sec
On 09/19/2012 06:56 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 06:39:54PM +0200, Andi wrote:
On 09/19/2012 06:14 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 03:35:56PM +0200, Andi wrote:
On 09/18/2012 11:38 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 11:40:24PM +0200, Andi wrote:
On 09/1
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 06:39:54PM +0200, Andi wrote:
> On 09/19/2012 06:14 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> >On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 03:35:56PM +0200, Andi wrote:
> >>On 09/18/2012 11:38 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> >>>On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 11:40:24PM +0200, Andi wrote:
> On 09/18/2012 11:29 PM, Ben Pfaff w
On 09/19/2012 06:14 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 03:35:56PM +0200, Andi wrote:
On 09/18/2012 11:38 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 11:40:24PM +0200, Andi wrote:
On 09/18/2012 11:29 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 11:33:33PM +0200, Andi wrote:
On 09/1
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 03:35:56PM +0200, Andi wrote:
> On 09/18/2012 11:38 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> >On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 11:40:24PM +0200, Andi wrote:
> >>On 09/18/2012 11:29 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> >>>On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 11:33:33PM +0200, Andi wrote:
> On 09/18/2012 11:26 PM, Ben Pfaff w
Hello Dear,
I apologies if this mail find you disturbing just that i want to discuss with
you an important issue.
kindly reach me back.
Yours Sincerely
Miss Alicia.___
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/d
On 09/18/2012 11:38 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 11:40:24PM +0200, Andi wrote:
On 09/18/2012 11:29 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 11:33:33PM +0200, Andi wrote:
On 09/18/2012 11:26 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 11:29:55PM +0200, Andi wrote:
On 09/1
42 matches
Mail list logo
