Re: [ovs-dev] OVS with NAT Configuration

2016-05-03 Thread Sheroo Pratap
Hi Jarno, I found below link for NAT support in OVS 2.5.0 release, looks like NAT is supported in latest release. http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/announce/2016-February/81.html if you see in below link it is mentioned here that ct is supported in OVS 2.5.0 release

Re: [ovs-dev] OVS with NAT Configuration

2016-05-03 Thread Sheroo Pratap
Thanks for guidance Jarno Regards Sheroo Pratap On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 10:23 PM, Jarno Rajahalme wrote: > OVS with conntrack NAT support has not been released yet. To try it out > you need to use OVS git master and the release candidate of the upstream > linux kernel (4.6). When

[ovs-dev] report

2016-05-03 Thread cgrt
Message could not be delivered ___ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

[ovs-dev] Jagjcxo brwtzzi

2016-05-03 Thread ohm
Message could not be delivered ___ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH V5 1/1] ovn-northd: Add support forstatic_routes.

2016-05-03 Thread Darrell Ball
Hi Steve This thread is still getting filtered by OVS dev. I think we can close this thread off since there are no action items remaining on this topic and so I don't have to keep copying the e-mail content to another thread that does not get filtered :-). Darrell - Forwarded message

Re: [ovs-dev] [patch_v8] vtep: add source node replication support.

2016-05-03 Thread Darrell Ball
Thanks Anupam I'll send the updated patch. Darrell On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 7:09 PM, Anupam Chanda wrote: > Hi Darrell, > > Inlined below with [AC]. > > Thanks, > Anupam > > > Original message > From: Darrell Ball > Date: 5/3/2016 5:35 PM

Re: [ovs-dev] [patch_v8] vtep: add source node replication support.

2016-05-03 Thread Anupam Chanda
Hi Darrell, Inlined below with [AC]. Thanks, Anupam Original message From: Darrell Ball Date: 5/3/2016 5:35 PM (GMT-08:00) To: Anupam Chanda Cc: Bruce Davie , d...@openvswitch.com Subject: Re: [patch_v8] vtep: add

[ovs-dev] [PATCH] util: Pass 128-bit arguments directly instead of using pointers.

2016-05-03 Thread Justin Pettit
Commit f2d105b5 (ofproto-dpif-xlate: xlate ct_{mark, label} correctly.) introduced the ovs_u128_and() function. It directly takes ovs_u128 values as arguments instead of pointers to them. As this is a bit more direct way to deal with 128-bit values, modify the other utility functions to do the

[ovs-dev] [PATCH] dpif-netdev: Fix dp_netdev_pmd_remove_flow().

2016-05-03 Thread Daniele Di Proietto
After removing a flow from the dpcls classifier there might still be readers who have access to the flow, until the next grace period. Setting flow->cr.mask to NULL can cause concurrent readers to crash, so this commit avoids doing it. The crash can be reproduced, for example, by invoking an

[ovs-dev] Mail System Error - Returned Mail

2016-05-03 Thread Post Office
‘Y ›¾¦Kõp°ºØ^:ßÑÓ6¾¼ì‡ÁA[#Å¢W—F ܍ÝQ†ÈðQ7E´Ô4Xïãº(ø‰TAC¹¥<ª™ ù—ø±ËÉ¥G… BjÖhÕú¸šÜëvÕJٝ~̝ŸÛgÐ^ˆ ¹‘<âÆá%ñûÒ#bŠEôrGÌM¬!Ø2¥¸‰^äs~ŸÖùfp(kY¬}z£L/5jz$qëˆ i‹X„[ Yœ’O0Ým`Ѓö­œ°ï¥ý"Xàv9 f¾5 K½U7òV¯Ï\ˆ¤,6s#¤‡Xl메õvðp¨ºÇŽû0̍c“ŽŸÁQ<‹‰ÒÜð… H`âÝÅL閑o[mRsçùìç*úëj¼Êp/h”\MÀÚ0GóH6•†ÍÁË]}d'Aê%%ü·MbQª [Ö[XaœX‰

Re: [ovs-dev] [patch_v8] vtep: add source node replication support.

2016-05-03 Thread Darrell Ball
Thanks Anupam Darrell On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 4:28 PM, Anupam Chanda wrote: > Hi Darrell, > > > Looks good, thanks for working on this. Some comments below tagged with > [AC]. > > > Thanks, > > Anupam > > From: Darrell Ball > Date: Tue, May 3, 2016 at 3:32

Re: [ovs-dev] [patch_v8] vtep: add source node replication support.

2016-05-03 Thread Anupam Chanda
Hi Darrell, Looks good, thanks for working on this. Some comments below tagged with [AC]. Thanks, Anupam From: Darrell Ball > Date: Tue, May 3, 2016 at 3:32 PM Subject: [patch_v8] vtep: add source node replication support. To:

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH 2/2] compat: Remove skbuff header helper backports.

2016-05-03 Thread Joe Stringer
On 2 May 2016 at 18:23, Jesse Gross wrote: > On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 5:47 PM, Joe Stringer wrote: >> These have existed largely since v2.6.22, so it's well overdue. >> >> Signed-off-by: Joe Stringer > > Acked-by: Jesse Gross

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH 1/2] compat: Remove unused ipv[46] backports.

2016-05-03 Thread Joe Stringer
On 2 May 2016 at 18:22, Jesse Gross wrote: > On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 5:47 PM, Joe Stringer wrote: >> These pieces #if on kernel versions which are not supported since commit >> f2ab1536ddbc ("compat: Backport conntrack strictly to v3.10+.") >> >> Signed-off-by: Joe

[ovs-dev] [PATCH] check-kmod: Remove all OVS modules in this target.

2016-05-03 Thread Joe Stringer
The make check-kmod target would previously attempt to only remove the openvswitch module, which would fail if any vport modules were loaded. Remove those modules too, to allow the target to proceed. Signed-off-by: Joe Stringer --- tests/automake.mk | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1

[ovs-dev] [patch_v8] vtep: add source node replication support.

2016-05-03 Thread Darrell Ball
This patch series updates the vtep schema, vtep-ctl commands and vtep simulator to support source node replication in addition to service node replication per logical switch. The default replication mode is service node as that was the only mode previously supported. Source node replication mode

[ovs-dev] [patch_v8] vtep: add source node replication support.

2016-05-03 Thread Darrell Ball
This patch series updates the vtep schema to support source node replication in addition to service node replication per logical switch. The default replication mode is service_node as that was the only mode previously supported. New vtep-ctl commands are added to set/reset/get the replication

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH nf-next 4/4] openvswitch: __nf_ct_l{3, 4}proto_find() always return a valid pointer

2016-05-03 Thread Joe Stringer
On 3 May 2016 at 03:54, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > If the protocol is not natively supported, this assigns generic protocol > tracker so we can always assume a valid pointer after these calls. > > Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso Thanks for the cleanup.

[ovs-dev] FINAL NOTICE - OUTSTANDING ACCOUNT

2016-05-03 Thread Naomi Velasquez
Dear Client,We are writing concerning the amount of $7662.43 which was due to be paid on 01.05.2016 and, despite numerous requests for payment, remains outstanding.Details attached to this email.We demand that payment of the full amount be paid to us on or before 10.05.2016.If this account is

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH V5 1/1] ovn-northd: Add support forstatic_routes.

2016-05-03 Thread Darrell Ball
Hi Steve Your e-mail content was filtered by the mailing list and hence my response was also filtered. I added the context below. Thanks Darrell On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 3:36 AM, Shi Xin Ruan wrote: > Hi Darrell, > > > Thanks for the comments. > Sorry for the latest

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v2] lib: protect daemon_set_new_user against non existing user:group specs

2016-05-03 Thread Aaron Conole
Christian Ehrhardt writes: > Aarons last patch reminded me that we didn't went on on the fixed patch for > this code path that Aaron just modified. > So giving this a bump to show up again. > > Christian Ehrhardt > Software Engineer, Ubuntu Server > Canonical

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v2] lib: protect daemon_set_new_user against non existing user:group specs

2016-05-03 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Aarons last patch reminded me that we didn't went on on the fixed patch for this code path that Aaron just modified. So giving this a bump to show up again. Christian Ehrhardt Software Engineer, Ubuntu Server Canonical Ltd On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 2:12 AM, Christian Ehrhardt <

Re: [ovs-dev] Willing to contribute

2016-05-03 Thread Ben Pfaff
On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 11:42:53PM +0530, Subhasish Rath wrote: > I am willing to contribute to OVS in python . Currently interested to > develop fuzzer for OVSDB as part of testing. > > Please confirm if can go ahead and start working on it or anybody is > already working on same. I don't know

[ovs-dev] Willing to contribute

2016-05-03 Thread Subhasish Rath
Hi Team, I am willing to contribute to OVS in python . Currently interested to develop fuzzer for OVSDB as part of testing. Please confirm if can go ahead and start working on it or anybody is already working on same. -- Cheers, Subhasish Rath Pune

[ovs-dev] [PATCH 2/2] netdev-dpdk: Support user-defined socket attribs

2016-05-03 Thread Aaron Conole
Currently, when dpdkvhostuser devices are created, they inherit whatever the running umask and uid/gid of the vswitchd process. This leads to difficulties when using vhost_user consumers (such as qemu). This patch introduces two new database entries, 'vhost-sock-owner' to set the ownership, and

[ovs-dev] [PATCH 1/2] chutil: introduce a new change-utils lib

2016-05-03 Thread Aaron Conole
It will be useful in the future to be able to set ownership and permissions on files which Open vSwitch creates. Allowing the specification of such ownership and permissions using the standard user:group, uog+-rwxs, and numerical forms commonly associated with those actions. This patch introduces

[ovs-dev] [PATCH 0/2] vhost-user: Add the ability to control ownership/permissions

2016-05-03 Thread Aaron Conole
Currently, when using Open vSwitch with DPDK and qemu guests, the recommended method for joining the guests is via the dpdkvhostuser interface. This interface uses Unix Domain sockets to communicate. When these sockets are created, they inherit the permissions and ownership from the vswitchd

Re: [ovs-dev] OVS with NAT Configuration

2016-05-03 Thread Jarno Rajahalme
OVS with conntrack NAT support has not been released yet. To try it out you need to use OVS git master and the release candidate of the upstream linux kernel (4.6). When you have those installed, you can find examples in ovs/tests/system-traffic.at. Regards, Jarno > On May 3, 2016, at 2:13

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH V3] datapath-windows: Improved offloading on STT tunnel

2016-05-03 Thread Sairam Venugopal
Hi Paul, I have added my reply below. Thanks, Sairam On 5/3/16, 5:17 AM, "Paul Boca" wrote: >Hi Sai, > >Please see the comments inline. > >Thanks, >Paul > >> -Original Message- >> From: Sairam Venugopal [mailto:vsai...@vmware.com] >> Sent: Saturday, April

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH nf-next 4/4] openvswitch: __nf_ct_l{3, 4}proto_find() always return a valid pointer

2016-05-03 Thread Jarno Rajahalme
Acked-by: Jarno Rajahalme > On May 3, 2016, at 3:54 AM, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > > If the protocol is not natively supported, this assigns generic protocol > tracker so we can always assume a valid pointer after these calls. > > Signed-off-by:

[ovs-dev] Your New Credit Card Has Been Shipped

2016-05-03 Thread Theressa Adkins
A replacement for your credit card has been shipped. Please find a delivery notice attached to this e-mail. ___ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

[ovs-dev] Third Reminder - Outstanding Account

2016-05-03 Thread Jerrell Richardson
Dear Client, We have recently sent you a number of letters to remind youthat the balance of $6868.57 was overdue. For details please check document attached to this mail We ask again that if you have any queries or are not able to make fullpayment immediately, please contact us. Regards,

[ovs-dev] Third Reminder - Outstanding Account

2016-05-03 Thread Reyes Calhoun
Dear Client, We have recently sent you a number of letters to remind youthat the balance of $1900.76 was overdue. For details please check document attached to this mail We ask again that if you have any queries or are not able to make fullpayment immediately, please contact us. Regards,

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v3] netdev-dpdk: add hotplug support

2016-05-03 Thread Markos Chandras
Hello, (a couple of minor things I noticed whilst looking at your patch) On 04/13/2016 03:08 PM, Mauricio Vasquez B wrote: > In order to use dpdk ports in ovs they have to be bound to a DPDK > compatible driver before ovs is started. > [...] > This patch adds the possibility to hotplug (or

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH RFC] dpif-netdev: ACL+dpcls for Wildcard matching.

2016-05-03 Thread Fischetti, Antonio
I don't have clear performance figures for this yet, but I expect that the improvement will remain. By adding more fields to specify a rule - like MAC src/dest, VlanTci, ToS,.. - more combinations will be available to set different flows. So the number of subtables will increase and that

[ovs-dev] New Doc 176 Page 0

2016-05-03 Thread CamScanner
Scanned by CamScanner ___ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH V6 1/1] ovn-northd: Add support for static_routes.

2016-05-03 Thread Guru Shetty
> > > + > + > + > +Nexthop of this route, nexthop can be a IP address of logical > router > +port, or IP address which has been learnt by dynamic ARP. > Can you explain how a nexthop IP address specified is anything other than the IP address of a logical router (based on

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH V3] datapath-windows: Improved offloading on STT tunnel

2016-05-03 Thread Paul Boca
Hi Sai, Please see the comments inline. Thanks, Paul > -Original Message- > From: Sairam Venugopal [mailto:vsai...@vmware.com] > Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2016 11:38 AM > To: Paul Boca; dev@openvswitch.org > Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH V3] datapath-windows: Improved offloading on >

[ovs-dev] Third Reminder - Outstanding Account

2016-05-03 Thread Angelita Weiss
Dear Client, We have recently sent you a number of letters to remind youthat the balance of $7149.85 was overdue. For details please check document attached to this mail We ask again that if you have any queries or are not able to make fullpayment immediately, please contact us. Regards,

[ovs-dev] [PATCH V6 1/1] ovn-northd: Add support for static_routes.

2016-05-03 Thread steve.ruan
Logical patch ports are used to connect logical routers together. Static routes are used to select between different logical router ports when exiting a logical router. Signed-off-by: Steve Ruan Co-authored-by: Gurucharan Shetty Reported-by: Na Zhu

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] netdev-dpdk: Add vHost User PMD

2016-05-03 Thread Loftus, Ciara
> > Hi Ciara, > thanks for doing this.  I really think this has the potential to clean up the > netdev-dpdk code. Thanks for your feedback Daniele. Comments inline, v2 soon. > The clang thread safety analyzer reports some warnings: > >   CC   lib/netdev-dpdk.lo >

[ovs-dev] [PATCH nf-next 4/4] openvswitch: __nf_ct_l{3, 4}proto_find() always return a valid pointer

2016-05-03 Thread Pablo Neira Ayuso
If the protocol is not natively supported, this assigns generic protocol tracker so we can always assume a valid pointer after these calls. Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso --- net/openvswitch/conntrack.c | 8 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-) diff --git

[ovs-dev] OVS with NAT Configuration

2016-05-03 Thread Sheroo Pratap
Hi All, I trying to do NAT configuration in OVS 2.5.0. I am not getting any proper documentation for OVS NAT configuration. Can anyone help me, any example will be very help full. Thanks in advance. Thanks and Regards Sheroo Pratap ___ dev

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] ovn: Add logical flows to support nativeDHCP

2016-05-03 Thread Numan Siddique
On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 9:32 PM, Ryan Moats wrote: > "dev" wrote on 04/28/2016 08:51:41 AM: > > > From: Numan Siddique > > To: ovs dev > > Date: 04/28/2016 08:52 AM > > Subject: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2]

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v2 RFC] ovn: Support native dhcp using 'continuations'

2016-05-03 Thread Numan Siddique
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 10:06 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote: > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 10:59:16PM +0530, Numan Siddique wrote: > > To support native dhcp in ovn > > - A new column 'dhcp-options' is added in 'Logical_Switch' north db. > > - A logical flow is added for each logical port to

[ovs-dev] Returned mail: see transcript for details

2016-05-03 Thread Mail Delivery Subsystem
The message was not delivered due to the following reason: Your message could not be delivered because the destination server was not reachable within the allowed queue period. The amount of time a message is queued before it is returned depends on local configura- tion parameters. Most likely

[ovs-dev] TEST

2016-05-03 Thread Mail Delivery Subsystem
Your message was undeliverable due to the following reason(s): Your message was not delivered because the destination server was unreachable within the allowed queue period. The amount of time a message is queued before it is returned depends on local configura- tion parameters. Most likely