-by: László Sürü <laszlo.s...@ericsson.com>
---
diff --git a/Documentation/topics/testing.rst b/Documentation/topics/testing.rst
index 06f99ad..85aa6a1 100644
--- a/Documentation/topics/testing.rst
+++ b/Documentation/topics/testing.rst
@@ -280,8 +280,9 @@ Native
++
The datapath tes
Thanks for the bfd update!
Just one more question,
Is the backporting of liveness propagation to OVS 2.7 branch planned also?
Thanks and regards
Laszlo
-Original Message-
From: Ben Pfaff [mailto:b...@ovn.org]
Sent: Friday, April 21, 2017 7:39 PM
To: László Sürü <laszl
attached log (see attachment).
Also, I've adapted the tests to the new OF 1.6 test as well.
Please find the modified patched below in this mail.
Thanks and regards
Laszlo
-Original Message-
From: Ben Pfaff [mailto:b...@ovn.org]
Sent: Saturday, April 15, 2017 6:44 AM
To: László Sürü <laszl
(connmgr_send_port_status()) is called only after that by
update_port().
Please find the modified patch below - working fine for me.
Thanks and regards
Laszlo
-Original Message-
From: Ben Pfaff [mailto:b...@ovn.org]
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2017 7:21 PM
To: László Sürü <laszl
.
I added 9 new unit tests to verify link state changes when monitored with cfm,
bfd or lacp for OF 1.3, OF 1.4 and OF 1.5.
I updated related unit tests according to the changes of ofproto-dpif.
Signed-off-by: László Sürü
Co-authored-by: Zoltán Balogh
Signed-off-by: Zoltán Balogh
Co-autho
[mailto:b...@ovn.org]
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2017 6:35 PM
To: László Sürü <laszlo.s...@ericsson.com>
Cc: ovs-dev@openvswitch.org
Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] ARP reply does not lead to revalidate
On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 04:04:10PM +, László Sürü wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are using OVS 2
Hi,
We are using OVS 2.6.1 to connect VMs via GRE tunneling in OpenStack
environment.
The bridge configuration is similar to proposed userspace tunneling at
https://github.com/openvswitch/ovs/blob/master/Documentation/howto/userspace-tunneling.rst
The 2 bridges are of netdev type as below.
-
Hi,
According to OpenFlow v1.3.5 specification a group is considered live, if it
has at least one live bucket in it.
(6.5 Group Table Modification Messages: ". A group is considered live if a
least one of its buckets is live.")
However, OVS 2.5 implementation incorrectly returns back group
Hi,
Using OpenFlow v1.3.5 and onwards OVS 2.5.0 returns OFPGMFC_INVALID_GROUP error
when an INDIRECT type of group deletion requested,
although the delete message is according to OpenFlow v1.3.5 standard.
The reason is the conflicting protocol check in Open vSwitch's OpenFlow
termination,