> -Original Message-
> From: Loftus, Ciara
> Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2016 10:22 AM
> To: Traynor, Kevin
> Cc: dev@openvswitch.org
> Subject: RE: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] netdev-dpdk: Add vHost User PMD
>
> > On 21/04/2016 13:20, Ciara Loftus wrote:
> > > DPDK
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@openvswitch.org] On Behalf Of Panu
> Matilainen
> Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2016 2:51 PM
> To: Daniele Di Proietto ; Loftus, Ciara
>
> Cc: dev@openvswitch.org
> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] netdev-dpdk: Add vHos
On 04/30/2016 03:23 AM, Daniele Di Proietto wrote:
I see that vhost-cuse is still handled separately. Is it possible to use
the vhost pmd also for vhost-cuse? Otherwise we still basically have to
handle differently three cases: NIC PMD, vhost user pmd, vhost cuse. Maybe
it's time to remove vhos
On 10.05.2016 12:38, Loftus, Ciara wrote:
>>
>> On 10.05.2016 11:31, Ilya Maximets wrote:
>>> On 03.05.2016 14:28, ciara.loftus at intel.com (Loftus, Ciara) wrote:
> This patch seem to remove a lot of txq remapping functions (like
> netdev_dpdk_remap_txqs).Ã, How does it handle the case o
>
> On 10.05.2016 11:31, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> > On 03.05.2016 14:28, ciara.loftus at intel.com (Loftus, Ciara) wrote:
> >>> This patch seem to remove a lot of txq remapping functions (like
> >>> netdev_dpdk_remap_txqs).Ã, How does it handle the case of a
> disabled txq in
> >>> the guest kerne
> On 21/04/2016 13:20, Ciara Loftus wrote:
> > DPDK 16.04 introduces the vHost PMD which allows 'dpdkvhostuser' ports
> > to be controlled by the librte_ether API, like physical 'dpdk' ports.
> > The commit integrates this functionality into OVS, and refactors some
> > of the existing vhost code su
CC:mail-list.
Sorry.
On 10.05.2016 11:31, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> On 03.05.2016 14:28, ciara.loftus at intel.com (Loftus, Ciara) wrote:
>>> This patch seem to remove a lot of txq remapping functions (like
>>> netdev_dpdk_remap_txqs). How does it handle the case of a disabled txq
>>> in
>>> the
>
> Hi Ciara,
> thanks for doing this. I really think this has the potential to clean up the
> netdev-dpdk code.
Thanks for your feedback Daniele. Comments inline, v2 soon.
> The clang thread safety analyzer reports some warnings:
>
> CC lib/netdev-dpdk.lo
> ../lib/netdev-dpdk.c:882:1:
Hi Ciara,
thanks for doing this. I really think this has the potential to clean up
the netdev-dpdk code.
The clang thread safety analyzer reports some warnings:
CC lib/netdev-dpdk.lo
../lib/netdev-dpdk.c:882:1: error: mutex 'dpdk_mutex' is not held on every
path through here [-Werror,-W
On 21/04/2016 13:20, Ciara Loftus wrote:
DPDK 16.04 introduces the vHost PMD which allows 'dpdkvhostuser' ports
to be controlled by the librte_ether API, like physical 'dpdk' ports.
The commit integrates this functionality into OVS, and refactors some
of the existing vhost code such that it is vh
DPDK 16.04 introduces the vHost PMD which allows 'dpdkvhostuser' ports
to be controlled by the librte_ether API, like physical 'dpdk' ports.
The commit integrates this functionality into OVS, and refactors some
of the existing vhost code such that it is vhost-cuse specific.
Similarly, there is now
11 matches
Mail list logo
