On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 3:32 PM, Andy Zhou wrote:
>>
>> It seems reasonable at first glance, but I wonder whether you went
>> through the history of this logic to make sure that we're not regressing
>> on any of the improvements we've made over time?
>
> This algorithm did not change much. As far
>
> It seems reasonable at first glance, but I wonder whether you went
> through the history of this logic to make sure that we're not regressing
> on any of the improvements we've made over time?
This algorithm did not change much. As far as I can tell, It has been
the same since 2.0. I believe
t
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 02:09:59PM -0700, Andy Zhou wrote:
> The current bond relancing logic is more complicated than necessary.
> When considering a bucket for rebalancing, we just need to make sure
> post rebalancing traffic will be closer to the ideal traffic split
> than before. This patch imp
The current bond relancing logic is more complicated than necessary.
When considering a bucket for rebalancing, we just need to make sure
post rebalancing traffic will be closer to the ideal traffic split
than before. This patch implements the simplification.
There is a bug is current algorithm th
