On 14 May 2016 at 21:41, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 02:17:12PM -0700, Joe Stringer wrote:
>> As per the delete_op_init{,__}() functions, the UFID should only be
>> passed down if ukey->ufid_present is set. Otherwise it is possible to
>> request a flow modification only using a UFID
On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 02:17:12PM -0700, Joe Stringer wrote:
> As per the delete_op_init{,__}() functions, the UFID should only be
> passed down if ukey->ufid_present is set. Otherwise it is possible to
> request a flow modification only using a UFID in a datapath that doesn't
> support UFID, whic
As per the delete_op_init{,__}() functions, the UFID should only be
passed down if ukey->ufid_present is set. Otherwise it is possible to
request a flow modification only using a UFID in a datapath that doesn't
support UFID, which will fail.
Fixes: 43b2f131a229 ("ofproto: Allow in-place modificati
