On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 8:05 PM, Ramu Ramamurthy
wrote:
> The following leaks are due to missing ds_destroy in a few
> places in build_acl.
>
> 5,850 bytes in 50 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 93 of 93
>at 0x4C29BFD: malloc (in
Hi Russell, I updated the patch with a Signed-off-by, but it landed
here as new on patchworks,
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/665079/
instead of updating the original here:
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/661079/
On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 4:50 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
>
>
The following leaks are due to missing ds_destroy in a few
places in build_acl.
5,850 bytes in 50 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 93 of 93
at 0x4C29BFD: malloc (in
/usr/lib64/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
by 0x4C2BACB: realloc (in
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 9:06 PM, Ramu Ramamurthy
wrote:
> From: Ramu Ramamurthy
>
> The following leaks are due to missing ds_destroy in a few
> places in build_acl.
>
> 5,850 bytes in 50 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 93 of 93
>
"dev" <dev-boun...@openvswitch.org> wrote on 08/19/2016 08:06:50 PM:
> From: Ramu Ramamurthy <ramu.ramamur...@gmail.com>
> To: dev@openvswitch.org
> Cc: Suryanarayan Ramamurthy/San Jose/IBM@IBMUS
> Date: 08/19/2016 08:07 PM
> Subject: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] o
"dev" <dev-boun...@openvswitch.org> wrote on 08/19/2016 08:06:50 PM:
> From: Ramu Ramamurthy <ramu.ramamur...@gmail.com>
> To: dev@openvswitch.org
> Cc: Suryanarayan Ramamurthy/San Jose/IBM@IBMUS
> Date: 08/19/2016 08:07 PM
> Subject: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] o
From: Ramu Ramamurthy
The following leaks are due to missing ds_destroy in a few
places in build_acl.
5,850 bytes in 50 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 93 of 93
at 0x4C29BFD: malloc (in
/usr/lib64/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
by