On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 2:31 PM, Jason Kölker wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 6:29 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 03:29:06AM +, Jason Kölker wrote:
>>> Callers to Idl.run() should be able to specify the number of iterations
>>> to run in one call. Instrumentation revealed th
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 6:29 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 03:29:06AM +, Jason Kölker wrote:
>> Callers to Idl.run() should be able to specify the number of iterations
>> to run in one call. Instrumentation revealed that a call to Idl.run() with a
>> can block up to a few seco
On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 03:29:06AM +, Jason Kölker wrote:
> Callers to Idl.run() should be able to specify the number of iterations
> to run in one call. Instrumentation revealed that a call to Idl.run() with a
> can block up to a few seconds, with most of the time being spent parsing
> message
I would like to request that, if accepted, this also be applied to branch-2.5.
Happy Hacking!
7-11
___
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
Callers to Idl.run() should be able to specify the number of iterations
to run in one call. Instrumentation revealed that a call to Idl.run() with a
can block up to a few seconds, with most of the time being spent parsing
messages.
Since parsing is a CPU only task eventlet and friends are unable t
