On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 10:27:09AM -0700, Joe Stringer wrote:
> On 14 September 2016 at 20:39, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > If the socket length does not include any of the bytes of the path, then
> > the code should not read even the first byte of the path.
> >
> > Found by valgrind.
> >
> > CC: Thadeu L
On 14 September 2016 at 20:39, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> If the socket length does not include any of the bytes of the path, then
> the code should not read even the first byte of the path.
>
> Found by valgrind.
>
> CC: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
> Reported-by: Joe Stringer
> Signed-off-by: Ben Pfa
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 08:39:03PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> If the socket length does not include any of the bytes of the path, then
> the code should not read even the first byte of the path.
>
> Found by valgrind.
>
> CC: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
> Reported-by: Joe Stringer
> Signed-off
If the socket length does not include any of the bytes of the path, then
the code should not read even the first byte of the path.
Found by valgrind.
CC: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
Reported-by: Joe Stringer
Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff
---
lib/socket-util-unix.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 ins