Testcase 1311, 1312: Boolean-distinct queries on scalars, reports leak
below:
xmalloc (util.c:112)
do_query_distinct (test-ovsdb.c:1208)
ovs_cmdl_run_command (command-line.c:121)
main (test-ovsdb.c:72)
Signed-off-by: William Tu
---
tests/test-ovsdb.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 inse
Testcase 1314: UUID-distinct queries on scalars.
Call stacks:
allocate_row (row.c:37)
ovsdb_row_clone (row.c:67)
do_query_distinct (test-ovsdb.c:1232)
ovs_cmdl_run_command (command-line.c:121)
main (test-ovsdb.c:72)
Signed-off-by: William Tu
---
tests/test-ovsdb.c | 4
1
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 08:29:27AM -0800, William Tu wrote:
> Testcase 1311, 1312: Boolean-distinct queries on scalars, reports leak
> below:
> xmalloc (util.c:112)
> do_query_distinct (test-ovsdb.c:1208)
> ovs_cmdl_run_command (command-line.c:121)
> main (test-ovsdb.c:72)
>
> Sign
I think so, too.
However, valgrind does not report any leak related to 'classes'. So I don't
have much confidence.
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 8:39 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 08:29:27AM -0800, William Tu wrote:
> > Testcase 1311, 1312: Boolean-distinct queries on scalars, reports
I'd go ahead and free it. If we're wrong, valgrind will tell us about
the invalid free.
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 08:45:28AM -0800, William Tu wrote:
> I think so, too.
> However, valgrind does not report any leak related to 'classes'. So I don't
> have much confidence.
>
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at
thanks, I will resubmit the patch.
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 9:31 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> I'd go ahead and free it. If we're wrong, valgrind will tell us about
> the invalid free.
>
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 08:45:28AM -0800, William Tu wrote:
> > I think so, too.
> > However, valgrind does not re
On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 02:15:13PM -0800, William Tu wrote:
> Testcase 1314: UUID-distinct queries on scalars.
> Call stacks:
> allocate_row (row.c:37)
> ovsdb_row_clone (row.c:67)
> do_query_distinct (test-ovsdb.c:1232)
> ovs_cmdl_run_command (command-line.c:121)
> main (test-o
