On 02/08/2016 13:19, "Joe Stringer" wrote:
>On 2 August 2016 at 11:58, Daniele Di Proietto wrote:
>> The conntrack unit tests seem to generate different megaflow masks on
>> Windows. The megaflow masks depend on the internal ordering of the
>> subtables, which are sorted using qsort(), based o
On 2 August 2016 at 11:58, Daniele Di Proietto wrote:
> The conntrack unit tests seem to generate different megaflow masks on
> Windows. The megaflow masks depend on the internal ordering of the
> subtables, which are sorted using qsort(), based on their max priority.
> If two subtables have the
The conntrack unit tests seem to generate different megaflow masks on
Windows. The megaflow masks depend on the internal ordering of the
subtables, which are sorted using qsort(), based on their max priority.
If two subtables have the same priority the ordering between them depend
on the stability