On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 03:09:05PM -0700, Joe Stringer wrote:
Thanks for review,
On 29 May 2015 at 13:22, Ben Pfaff b...@nicira.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 05:56:15PM -0700, Joe Stringer wrote:
Signed-off-by: Joe Stringer joestrin...@nicira.com
The code in scan_u128() looks
On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 10:13:06AM -0700, Joe Stringer wrote:
For UFID, I sent a patch to reuse UUID for UFID:
http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/dev/2015-June/055890.html
OK, I'll go look at it now.
I'm currently thinking that for 128-bit maskable bitfields like
conn_label, I'll have
On Jun 6, 2015, at 2:13 PM, Ben Pfaff b...@nicira.com wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 03:09:05PM -0700, Joe Stringer wrote:
Thanks for review,
On 29 May 2015 at 13:22, Ben Pfaff b...@nicira.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 05:56:15PM -0700, Joe Stringer wrote:
Signed-off-by: Joe
For UFID, I sent a patch to reuse UUID for UFID:
http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/dev/2015-June/055890.html
I'm currently thinking that for 128-bit maskable bitfields like
conn_label, I'll have something similar to this original patch, which
will represent the value as
Thanks for review,
On 29 May 2015 at 13:22, Ben Pfaff b...@nicira.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 05:56:15PM -0700, Joe Stringer wrote:
Signed-off-by: Joe Stringer joestrin...@nicira.com
The code in scan_u128() looks wrong to me: I don't see anything that
makes the second call to
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 05:56:15PM -0700, Joe Stringer wrote:
Signed-off-by: Joe Stringer joestrin...@nicira.com
The code in scan_u128() looks wrong to me: I don't see anything that
makes the second call to ovs_scan(), to get the mask, skip past the
value, e.g. by passing s + n to the second
Signed-off-by: Joe Stringer joestrin...@nicira.com
---
include/openvswitch/types.h |7 --
lib/odp-util.c | 50 +++
lib/util.h | 17 +++
tests/test-hash.c | 10 -
4 files changed, 62
