Daniele,
Thanks for testing, pushed to master.
Jarno
On Nov 17, 2014, at 9:13 AM, Daniele Venturino daniele.ventur...@m3s.it wrote:
The problem must be that the port number and the hash value get out of sync,
i.e., when the port number is changed. Please try the patch below on top of
Daniele,
Thanks for testing, pushed to master.
Jarno
On Nov 17, 2014, at 9:13 AM, Daniele Venturino daniele.ventur...@m3s.it wrote:
The problem must be that the port number and the hash value get out of sync,
i.e., when the port number is changed. Please try the patch below on top of
Thanks!
On patch 14/17 there’s a little change to add, which I anticipated in my
previous mail.
bundle_move() expects two “struct ofbundle” as arguments. With the current
patch the two tests pertaining the MAC learning shifting fail.
I just tested the merged version and this seems to be a good
On Nov 19, 2014, at 12:21 PM, Daniele Venturino daniele.ventur...@m3s.it
wrote:
Thanks!
On patch 14/17 there’s a little change to add, which I anticipated in my
previous mail.
bundle_move() expects two “struct ofbundle” as arguments. With the current
patch the two tests pertaining the
The problem must be that the port number and the hash value get out of sync,
i.e., when the port number is changed. Please try the patch below on top of
your patch and check if you still have the same problem.
With your modifications pertaining the hashmap those tests passed.
I had to revert
Why lose the ‘_WITH_HASH’? It seems pointless to iterate over all the
ports, when we just care of the port with the ‘port_number’?
With the _WITH_HASH a test on learned addresses shifting fails. It seems
like it doesn't even enter the FOR_EACH cycle when the port_number is not
1, maybe there
On Nov 14, 2014, at 9:19 AM, Daniele Venturino daniele.ventur...@m3s.it wrote:
Why lose the ‘_WITH_HASH’? It seems pointless to iterate over all the ports,
when we just care of the port with the ‘port_number’?
With the _WITH_HASH a test on learned addresses shifting fails. It seems like
Daniele,
See comments inline.
Thanks!
Jarno
On Nov 6, 2014, at 7:31 AM, Daniele Venturino daniele.ventur...@m3s.it wrote:
All MAC addresses previously learned on a Root Port can be moved to an
Alternate Port that becomes the new Root Port; i.e., Dynamic Filtering
Entries
All MAC addresses previously learned on a Root Port can be moved to an
Alternate Port that becomes the new Root Port; i.e., Dynamic Filtering
Entries for those addresses may be modified to show the new Root Port as
their source, reducing the need to flood frames when
