I'm not sure, but if a user enabled one of them with
*ovs-vsctl set Bridge br0 stp_enable/rstp_enable=true*
and then the other one with
*ovs-vsctl set Bridge br0 rstp_enable/stp_enable=true*
this last command has no effects. See:
static void
bridge_configure_rstp(struct bridge *br)
{
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 04:00:36PM +0100, Daniele Venturino wrote:
+STP and RSTP are mutually exclusive. If both are enabled, RSTP
+will be used.
I think this might not be true.
If it has not been changed, when STP or RSTP is enabled it should not be
possible
Thanks for confirming.
I sent out a patch to make behavior better resemble what ovs-vswitchd
does in other similar situations. Will you look at it? It is here:
http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/dev/2015-March/052049.html
On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 07:06:02PM +0100, Daniele Venturino wrote:
Hi,
+STP and RSTP are mutually exclusive. If both are enabled, RSTP
+will be used.
I think this might not be true.
If it has not been changed, when STP or RSTP is enabled it should not be
possible to enable the other one on the same bridge.
This is done in
A fair number of columns had been overlooked. This documents them.
The patch is smaller than it appears because this rearranges the STP and
RSTP documentation to group configuration, status, and statistics together
in the documentation for clarity.
Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff b...@nicira.com
---
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 12:12 AM, Ben Pfaff b...@nicira.com wrote:
A fair number of columns had been overlooked. This documents them.
The patch is smaller than it appears because this rearranges the STP and
RSTP documentation to group configuration, status, and statistics together
in the
I decided to apply this, but I'd still like to improve the
documentation further if possible, so when you get a chance please
review the RSTP documentation in vswitch.xml.
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 09:48:15AM -0800, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
I?ll look in to this,
Jarno
On Feb 19, 2015, at
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 04:00:43AM -0800, Gurucharan Shetty wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 12:12 AM, Ben Pfaff b...@nicira.com wrote:
A fair number of columns had been overlooked. This documents them.
The patch is smaller than it appears because this rearranges the STP and
RSTP
I’ll look in to this,
Jarno
On Feb 19, 2015, at 9:22 AM, Ben Pfaff b...@nicira.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 04:00:43AM -0800, Gurucharan Shetty wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 12:12 AM, Ben Pfaff b...@nicira.com wrote:
A fair number of columns had been overlooked. This documents
