> -Original Message-
> > From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@openvswitch.org] On Behalf Of Ciara
> Loftus
> > Sent: Tuesday, 14 June, 2016 16:08
> > To: dev@openvswitch.org
> > Subject: [ovs-dev] [PATCH RFC 0/1] netdev-dpdk: Arbitrary 'dpdk' port
> > naming
&g
tible drivers (e.g.
> igb_uio, vfio_pci etc) at start of ovs-vswitchd?
>
> BR, Jan
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@openvswitch.org] On Behalf Of Ciara Loftus
> > Sent: Tuesday, 14 June, 2016 16:08
> > To: dev@openvswitch.org
>
> Sent: Tuesday, 14 June, 2016 16:08
> To: dev@openvswitch.org
> Subject: [ovs-dev] [PATCH RFC 0/1] netdev-dpdk: Arbitrary 'dpdk' port
> naming
>
> This RFC patch addresses the restrictions placed on dpdk port names.
>
> Currently dpdk ports must be named dpdkX where X i
This RFC patch addresses the restrictions placed on dpdk port names.
Currently dpdk ports must be named dpdkX where X is the dpdk port-id.
This patch removes this restriction and introduces the requirement to
specify the pci address of the device in the other_config db. eg.
ovs-vsctl add-port
