>
>"Kavanagh, Mark B" writes:
>
>>>
>>>"Kavanagh, Mark B" writes:
>>>
>
>"Kavanagh, Mark B" writes:
>> Further clarifications below Aaron - please let me know if you have
>> any additional comments.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Mark
>
>Thanks again for this work, Mark!
>>
"Kavanagh, Mark B" writes:
>>
>>"Kavanagh, Mark B" writes:
>>
"Kavanagh, Mark B" writes:
> Further clarifications below Aaron - please let me know if you have
> any additional comments.
>
> Thanks,
> Mark
Thanks again for this work, Mark!
>>
>>
>
>"Kavanagh, Mark B" writes:
>
>>>
>>>"Kavanagh, Mark B" writes:
Further clarifications below Aaron - please let me know if you have
any additional comments.
Thanks,
Mark
>>>
>>>Thanks again for this work, Mark!
>>>
>
>One addendum below, Aaron.
>
>>
"Kavanagh, Mark B" writes:
>>
>>"Kavanagh, Mark B" writes:
>>> Further clarifications below Aaron - please let me know if you have
>>> any additional comments.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Mark
>>
>>Thanks again for this work, Mark!
>>
One addendum below, Aaron.
>
>>Hi Mark,
>>
>"Kavanagh, Mark B" writes:
>
>>>
>>>"Kavanagh, Mark B" writes:
Further clarifications below Aaron - please let me know if you have
any additional comments.
Thanks,
Mark
>>>
>>>Thanks again for this work, Mark!
>>>
>
>One addendum below, Aaron.
>
>>
>>
>
>"Kavanagh, Mark B" writes:
>> Further clarifications below Aaron - please let me know if you have
>> any additional comments.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Mark
>
>Thanks again for this work, Mark!
>
>>>
>>>One addendum below, Aaron.
>>>
>Hi Mark,
>
>Thanks for the patch! I've not done a ve
"Kavanagh, Mark B" writes:
> Further clarifications below Aaron - please let me know if you have
> any additional comments.
>
> Thanks,
> Mark
Thanks again for this work, Mark!
>>
>>One addendum below, Aaron.
>>
>>>
Hi Mark,
Thanks for the patch! I've not done a very thorough review
Further clarifications below Aaron - please let me know if you have any
additional comments.
Thanks,
Mark
>
>One addendum below, Aaron.
>
>>
>>>Hi Mark,
>>>
>>>Thanks for the patch! I've not done a very thorough review of this, but
>>>my first-blush comments are inline.
>>
>>Thanks for the revie
One addendum below, Aaron.
>
>>Hi Mark,
>>
>>Thanks for the patch! I've not done a very thorough review of this, but
>>my first-blush comments are inline.
>
>Thanks for the review Aaron!
>
>Any additional comments are welcome - my initial responses are inline, below.
>
>Thanks,
>Mark
>
>>
>>Mark K
>Hi Mark,
>
>Thanks for the patch! I've not done a very thorough review of this, but
>my first-blush comments are inline.
Thanks for the review Aaron!
Any additional comments are welcome - my initial responses are inline, below.
Thanks,
Mark
>
>Mark Kavanagh writes:
>> Add support for Jumbo Fr
Hi Mark,
Thanks for the patch! I've not done a very thorough review of this, but
my first-blush comments are inline.
Mark Kavanagh writes:
> Add support for Jumbo Frames to DPDK-enabled port types,
> using single-segment-mbufs.
>
> Using this approach, the amount of memory allocated for each mbu
Add support for Jumbo Frames to DPDK-enabled port types,
using single-segment-mbufs.
Using this approach, the amount of memory allocated for each mbuf
to store frame data is increased to a value greater than 1518B
(typical Ethernet maximum frame length). The increased space
available in the mbuf m
12 matches
Mail list logo