On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 1:06 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 05:20:34PM -0700, Jesse Gross wrote:
>> Currently metadata transmitted by OVN over Geneve tunnels is
>> unprotected by any checksum other than the one provided by the link
>> layer - this includes both the
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 7:10 PM, Ryan Moats <rmo...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> "dev" <dev-boun...@openvswitch.org> wrote on 08/11/2016 07:20:34 PM:
>
>> From: Jesse Gross <je...@kernel.org>
>> To: dev@openvswitch.org
>> Date: 08/11/2016 07:22 PM
>
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 05:20:34PM -0700, Jesse Gross wrote:
> Currently metadata transmitted by OVN over Geneve tunnels is
> unprotected by any checksum other than the one provided by the link
> layer - this includes both the VNI and data stored in options. Turning
> on UDP checksums which cover
"dev" <dev-boun...@openvswitch.org> wrote on 08/11/2016 07:20:34 PM:
> From: Jesse Gross <je...@kernel.org>
> To: dev@openvswitch.org
> Date: 08/11/2016 07:22 PM
> Subject: [ovs-dev] [PATCH rebase 3/3] ovn-controller: Use UDP
> checksums when creating Genev
Currently metadata transmitted by OVN over Geneve tunnels is
unprotected by any checksum other than the one provided by the link
layer - this includes both the VNI and data stored in options. Turning
on UDP checksums which cover this data has obvious benefits in terms of
integrity protection.
In