This is a proposed plan for logical L3 in OVN. It is not entirely
complete but it includes many important details and I believe that it moves
planning forward.
Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff
---
v1->v2: Resolve comments from Justin and Russell posted to ovs-dev.
ovn/TODO| 281 +++
On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> This is a proposed plan for logical L3 in OVN. It is not entirely
> complete but it includes many important details and I believe that it moves
> planning forward.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff
> ---
> v1->v2: Resolve comments from Justin and Rus
> On Oct 6, 2015, at 2:48 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>> This is a proposed plan for logical L3 in OVN. It is not entirely
>> complete but it includes many important details and I believe that it moves
>> planning forward.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ben
On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 05:20:58PM -0700, Justin Pettit wrote:
>
> > On Oct 6, 2015, at 2:48 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> >> This is a proposed plan for logical L3 in OVN. It is not entirely
> >> complete but it includes many important details
Hi Ben,
Very nice document, and I have some questions.
On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> This is a proposed plan for logical L3 in OVN. It is not entirely
> complete but it includes many important details and I believe that it moves
> planning forward.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Pf
Sorry, correct a typo:
On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 11:55 PM, Han Zhou wrote:
> This would be a very interesting feature. But would it become scaling
> bottleneck if each HV need to be programmed to hold all the logical
> router flows (because it doesn't know whom could it be talking to)?
> Or would i
On 10/08/2015 01:06 PM, Han Zhou wrote:
Sorry, correct a typo:
On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 11:55 PM, Han Zhou wrote:
This would be a very interesting feature. But would it become scaling
bottleneck if each HV need to be programmed to hold all the logical
router flows (because it doesn't know who
Hi Venkata,
On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 1:32 AM, Venkata Anil wrote:
>
>
> On 10/08/2015 01:06 PM, Han Zhou wrote:
>>
>> Sorry, correct a typo:
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 11:55 PM, Han Zhou wrote:
>>
>>> This would be a very interesting feature. But would it become scaling
>>> bottleneck if each HV
