> On May 29, 2015, at 5:23 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 04:10:14PM -0700, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
>> OpenFlow 1.4 bundles are easier to implement when it is possible to
>> mark a rule as 'to_be_removed' and then insert a new, identical rule
>> with the same priority.
>>
>> Al
> On May 29, 2015, at 5:23 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> + * Tentative Modifications
> + * ===
> + *
> + * When a new rule is added to a classifier, it can optionally be
> "invisible".
> + * That means that lookups won't find the rule, although iterations through
> + * the classi
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 04:10:14PM -0700, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
> OpenFlow 1.4 bundles are easier to implement when it is possible to
> mark a rule as 'to_be_removed' and then insert a new, identical rule
> with the same priority.
>
> All but one out of the identical rules must be marked as
> 'to
OpenFlow 1.4 bundles are easier to implement when it is possible to
mark a rule as 'to_be_removed' and then insert a new, identical rule
with the same priority.
All but one out of the identical rules must be marked as
'to_be_removed', and the one rule that is not 'to_be_removed' must
have been ins
