Daniele, are you the right person to review and apply this pair of
patches?
Thanks,
Ben.
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 02:55:57PM -0500, Mauricio Vasquez B wrote:
> Current implementation of dpdk_dev_parse_name does not perform a robust
> error handling, port names as "dpdkr", "dpdkr1x", "dpdkr 5" are
Current implementation of dpdk_dev_parse_name does not perform a robust
error handling, port names as "dpdkr", "dpdkr1x", "dpdkr 5" are considered
valid.
With this path only positive port numbers in decimal notation are considered
valid.
Signed-off-by: Mauricio Vasquez B
---
v2:
- replace strtol