On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 2:05 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 12:39:36PM -0400, Flavio Fernandes wrote:
> > To be discussed:
> >
> > One caveat here is that ttl should be decremented before vm
> > reaches , assuming the ping packet is coming from
> > a remote subnet.
> >
> > In shor
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 12:39:36PM -0400, Flavio Fernandes wrote:
> To be discussed:
>
> One caveat here is that ttl should be decremented before vm
> reaches , assuming the ping packet is coming from
> a remote subnet.
>
> In short, we ideally would have the match augmented to look
> like this.
When responding to icmp echo requests (aka ping) packets, the logical
router should not restrict responses based on the inport.
Example diagram:
vm: IP1.1 (subnet1)
logical_router: IP1.2 (subnet1) and IP2.2 (subnet2)
vm ---[subnet1]--- logical_router ---[subnet2]