On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 08:06:03AM +0300, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> First two patches "Is being held until the list moderator can review
> it for approval."
>
> Could anyone approve them?
>
> 'fat-rwlock's are very suspicious.
We won't tolerate fat-shaming around here...
___
First two patches "Is being held until the list moderator can review
it for approval."
Could anyone approve them?
'fat-rwlock's are very suspicious.
Best regards, Ilya Maximets.
On 11.07.2016 18:15, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> This is the second part of XPS patch-set which contains XPS itself.
> Imp
This is the second part of XPS patch-set which contains XPS itself.
Implementation will use dp->ports structure by PMD threads. This
requires replacing of port_mutex with rwlock.
Also generic changes applied to fat-rwlock itself to add new
functionality: Upgrading read-lock to write-lock and backw
