Guru Shetty wrote on 08/25/2016 03:11:42 PM:
> From: Guru Shetty
> To: Ryan Moats/Omaha/IBM@IBMUS
> Cc: ovs dev
> Date: 08/25/2016 03:11 PM
> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v4] ovn-controller: Back out
> incremental processing
>
> On 25 August 2016 at 13:04, Guru
On 25 August 2016 at 13:04, Guru Shetty wrote:
>
>
> On 24 August 2016 at 18:30, Ryan Moats wrote:
>
>> As [1] indicates, incremental processing hasn't resulted
>> in an improvement worth the complexity it has added.
>> This patch backs out all of the code specific to incremental
>> processing,
On 24 August 2016 at 18:30, Ryan Moats wrote:
> As [1] indicates, incremental processing hasn't resulted
> in an improvement worth the complexity it has added.
> This patch backs out all of the code specific to incremental
> processing, along with the persisting of OF flows,
> logical ports, mult
Russell Bryant wrote on 08/25/2016 12:45:44 PM:
> From: Russell Bryant
> To: Ryan Moats/Omaha/IBM@IBMUS
> Cc: ovs dev
> Date: 08/25/2016 12:46 PM
> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v4] ovn-controller: Back out
> incremental processing
>
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 9:30 PM,
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 9:30 PM, Ryan Moats wrote:
> As [1] indicates, incremental processing hasn't resulted
> in an improvement worth the complexity it has added.
> This patch backs out all of the code specific to incremental
> processing, along with the persisting of OF flows,
> logical ports,
> On Aug 24, 2016, at 9:30 PM, Ryan Moats wrote:
>
> As [1] indicates, incremental processing hasn't resulted
> in an improvement worth the complexity it has added.
> This patch backs out all of the code specific to incremental
> processing, along with the persisting of OF flows,
> logical ports
As [1] indicates, incremental processing hasn't resulted
in an improvement worth the complexity it has added.
This patch backs out all of the code specific to incremental
processing, along with the persisting of OF flows,
logical ports, multicast groups, all_lports, local and patched
datapaths
[1]
