On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 11:38:54PM +0800, Xiao Liang wrote:
> Flow key handleing changes:
> - Add VLAN header array in struct flow, to record multiple 802.1q VLAN
> headers.
> - Add dpif multi-VLAN capability probing. If datapath supports multi-VLAN,
> increase the maximum depth of nested OVS_K
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 12:52 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 11:38:54PM +0800, Xiao Liang wrote:
>> Flow key handleing changes:
>> - Add VLAN header array in struct flow, to record multiple 802.1q VLAN
>> headers.
>> - Add dpif multi-VLAN capability probing. If datapath supports
On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 11:51:25AM +0800, Xiao Liang wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 12:52 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 11:38:54PM +0800, Xiao Liang wrote:
> >> Flow key handleing changes:
> >> - Add VLAN header array in struct flow, to record multiple 802.1q VLAN
> >> heade
On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 11:38:54PM +0800, Xiao Liang wrote:
> Flow key handleing changes:
> - Add VLAN header array in struct flow, to record multiple 802.1q VLAN
> headers.
> - Add dpif multi-VLAN capability probing. If datapath supports multi-VLAN,
> increase the maximum depth of nested OVS_K
Thanks! I'm working on code changes according to your comments. I
think we need more discussion about the ethertype matching. Please see
inline.
Thanks,
Xiao
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 2:40 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 11:38:54PM +0800, Xiao Liang wrote:
>> Flow key handleing chan
On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 08:22:47AM +0800, Xiao Liang wrote:
> Thanks! I'm working on code changes according to your comments. I
> think we need more discussion about the ethertype matching. Please see
> inline.
Can we reach an agreement on the ethertype matching? It has implications
on the kernel
Thanks for the replies, I have some further responses below.
On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 08:22:47AM +0800, Xiao Liang wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 2:40 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > I'm concerned about backward compatibility. Consider some application
> > built on Open vSwitch using OpenFlow. Today,
On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 10:25:21AM -0400, Eric Garver wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 08:22:47AM +0800, Xiao Liang wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 2:40 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 11:38:54PM +0800, Xiao Liang wrote:
> .. snip ..
> > > I'm concerned about backward compati
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 6:07 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> Thanks for the replies, I have some further responses below.
>
> On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 08:22:47AM +0800, Xiao Liang wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 2:40 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>> > I'm concerned about backward compatibility. Consider some appl
On Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 10:54:00AM +0800, Xiao Liang wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 6:07 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > Thanks for the replies, I have some further responses below.
> >
> > On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 08:22:47AM +0800, Xiao Liang wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 2:40 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote
On Sat, Aug 06, 2016 at 08:04:44PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 10:54:00AM +0800, Xiao Liang wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 6:07 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > > Thanks for the replies, I have some further responses below.
> > >
> > > On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 08:22:47AM +0800, Xia
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 04:19:31PM -0400, Eric Garver wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 06, 2016 at 08:04:44PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 10:54:00AM +0800, Xiao Liang wrote:
> > > On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 6:07 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > > > Thanks for the replies, I have some further respo
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 01:24:10PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 04:19:31PM -0400, Eric Garver wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 06, 2016 at 08:04:44PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > > On Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 10:54:00AM +0800, Xiao Liang wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 6:07 AM, Ben Pfaf
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 04:42:18PM -0400, Eric Garver wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 01:24:10PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 04:19:31PM -0400, Eric Garver wrote:
> > > On Sat, Aug 06, 2016 at 08:04:44PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 10:54:00AM +080
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@openvswitch.org] On Behalf Of Ben Pfaff
> Sent: Friday, August 19, 2016 9:57 PM
> To: Xiao Liang ; dev@openvswitch.org
> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v4 1/4] Add support for 802.1ad (QinQ tunneling)
>
> On Fri,
On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 01:41:26AM +, Mooney, Sean K wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@openvswitch.org] On Behalf Of Ben Pfaff
> > Sent: Friday, August 19, 2016 9:57 PM
> > To: Xiao Liang ; dev@openvswitch.org
> >
On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 9:41 AM, Mooney, Sean K wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@openvswitch.org] On Behalf Of Ben Pfaff
>> Sent: Friday, August 19, 2016 9:57 PM
>> To: Xiao Liang ; dev@openvswitch.org
>> Subject: Re:
> -Original Message-
> From: Xiao Liang [mailto:shaw.l...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, September 9, 2016 5:27 AM
> To: Mooney, Sean K
> Cc: Ben Pfaff ; dev@openvswitch.org
> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v4 1/4] Add support for 802.1ad (QinQ
> tunneling)
>
> O
switch.org] On Behalf Of Ben
>> Pfaff
>> >> Sent: Friday, August 19, 2016 9:57 PM
>> >> To: Xiao Liang ; dev@openvswitch.org
>> >> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v4 1/4] Add support for 802.1ad (QinQ
>> >> tunneling)
>> >>
>> >> On Fr
19 matches
Mail list logo
