Hi Ben,
I apologize for the delay, I can definitely review this.
Thanks,
Daniele
On 12/10/2015 19:09, "Ben Pfaff" wrote:
>Daniele, are you the right person to review this? If not, do you know
>who should review it?
___
dev
Hi Ilya,
Sorry for the delay,
One question inline
On 11/09/2015 12:38, "Ilya Maximets" wrote:
>Currently tx_qid is equal to pmd->core_id. This leads to unexpected
>behavior if pmd-cpu-mask different from '/(0*)(1|3|7)?(f*)/',
>e.g. if core_ids are not sequential, or
On 13.10.2015 18:00, Daniele Di Proietto wrote:
>> @@ -2620,9 +2733,20 @@ pmd_load_queues(struct dp_netdev_pmd_thread *pmd,
>> poll_list[poll_cnt].rx = port->rxq[i];
>> poll_cnt++;
>> }
>> -index++;
>> +
Daniele, are you the right person to review this? If not, do you know
who should review it?
___
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
Ping v2
On 23.09.2015 15:22, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> Ping.
>
> On 11.09.2015 14:38, Ilya Maximets wrote:
>> Currently tx_qid is equal to pmd->core_id. This leads to unexpected
>> behavior if pmd-cpu-mask different from '/(0*)(1|3|7)?(f*)/',
>> e.g. if core_ids are not sequential, or doesn't start
Ping.
On 11.09.2015 14:38, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> Currently tx_qid is equal to pmd->core_id. This leads to unexpected
> behavior if pmd-cpu-mask different from '/(0*)(1|3|7)?(f*)/',
> e.g. if core_ids are not sequential, or doesn't start from 0, or both.
>
> Example:
> starting 2 pmd
Currently tx_qid is equal to pmd->core_id. This leads to unexpected
behavior if pmd-cpu-mask different from '/(0*)(1|3|7)?(f*)/',
e.g. if core_ids are not sequential, or doesn't start from 0, or both.
Example:
starting 2 pmd threads with 1 port, 2 rxqs per port,
pmd-cpu-mask =