Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCHv2] lib: upgrade to DPDK 1.8

2015-02-11 Thread Ben Pfaff
o the stream. > > Thanks, > Mark > > > -Original Message- > > From: Ben Pfaff [mailto:b...@nicira.com] > > Sent: Friday, February 6, 2015 8:41 PM > > To: Kavanagh, Mark B > > Cc: dev@openvswitch.org; Rory Sexton > > Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCHv

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCHv2] lib: upgrade to DPDK 1.8

2015-02-11 Thread Ben Pfaff
---Original Message- >> > From: Ben Pfaff [mailto:b...@nicira.com] >> > Sent: Friday, February 6, 2015 8:41 PM >> > To: Kavanagh, Mark B >> > Cc: dev@openvswitch.org; Rory Sexton >> > Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCHv2] lib: upgrade to DPDK 1.8 >> &

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCHv2] lib: upgrade to DPDK 1.8

2015-02-11 Thread Kavanagh, Mark B
ll address these, and your comments below in the next version. > > Thanks, > Mark > > > -Original Message- > > From: Pravin Shelar [mailto:pshe...@nicira.com] > > Sent: Friday, February 6, 2015 11:05 PM > > To: Kavanagh, Mark B > > Cc: dev@openvs

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCHv2] lib: upgrade to DPDK 1.8

2015-02-11 Thread Pravin Shelar
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 2:27 AM, Kavanagh, Mark B wrote: > Hi Pravin, > > The tests fail because the amount of data that an 'mbuf-type' ofpbuf can > store is now restricted to UINT16_MAX. > > In the failed tests, the amount of data added to the ofpbuf far exceeds this > limit; resolving this sho

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCHv2] lib: upgrade to DPDK 1.8

2015-02-11 Thread Kavanagh, Mark B
nday, February 9, 2015 4:33 PM > To: Kavanagh, Mark B > Cc: dev@openvswitch.org; Rory Sexton > Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCHv2] lib: upgrade to DPDK 1.8 > > I keep getting a bounce on rory.sex...@intel.com ("550 #5.1.0 Address > rejected."). Is that email address correct

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCHv2] lib: upgrade to DPDK 1.8

2015-02-11 Thread Kavanagh, Mark B
nagh, Mark B > Cc: dev@openvswitch.org; Rory Sexton > Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCHv2] lib: upgrade to DPDK 1.8 > > On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 04:43:26PM +, Mark Kavanagh wrote: > > DPDK v1.8.0 makes significant changes to struct rte_mbuf, including > > removal of the '

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCHv2] lib: upgrade to DPDK 1.8

2015-02-06 Thread Pravin Shelar
I am seeing 4 tests failed with following assertion failed which is introduced by the patch. "assertion v <= OFPBUF_DATA_MAX failed in ofpbuf_set_size()" I have couple of comments inline. On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 8:43 AM, Mark Kavanagh wrote: > DPDK v1.8.0 makes significant changes to struct rte_m

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCHv2] lib: upgrade to DPDK 1.8

2015-02-06 Thread Ben Pfaff
On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 04:43:26PM +, Mark Kavanagh wrote: > DPDK v1.8.0 makes significant changes to struct rte_mbuf, including > removal of the 'pkt' and 'data' fields. The latter, formally a > pointer, is now calculated via an offset from the start of the > segment buffer. These fields are r

[ovs-dev] [PATCHv2] lib: upgrade to DPDK 1.8

2015-02-06 Thread Mark Kavanagh
DPDK v1.8.0 makes significant changes to struct rte_mbuf, including removal of the 'pkt' and 'data' fields. The latter, formally a pointer, is now calculated via an offset from the start of the segment buffer. These fields are referenced by OVS when accessing the data section of an ofpbuf. The fol