; > > Cc: dev@openvswitch.org
> > > Date: 08/31/2016 12:53 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [ovs-dev, v2, 3/4] Unpersist data structures
> > > for address sets.
> > > Sent by: "dev" <dev-boun...@openvswitch.org>
> > >
> > >
; > Date: 08/31/2016 12:53 PM
> > Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [ovs-dev, v2, 3/4] Unpersist data structures
> > for address sets.
> > Sent by: "dev" <dev-boun...@openvswitch.org>
> >
> >
> > Ben Pfaff <b...@ovn.org> wrote on 08/31/2016 12:3
"dev" <dev-boun...@openvswitch.org> wrote on 08/31/2016 12:53:27 PM:
> From: Ryan Moats/Omaha/IBM@IBMUS
> To: Ben Pfaff <b...@ovn.org>
> Cc: dev@openvswitch.org
> Date: 08/31/2016 12:53 PM
> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [ovs-dev, v2, 3/4] Unpersist data structure
Ben Pfaff wrote on 08/31/2016 12:38:34 PM:
> From: Ben Pfaff
> To: Ryan Moats/Omaha/IBM@IBMUS
> Cc: dev@openvswitch.org
> Date: 08/31/2016 12:38 PM
> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev,v2,3/4] Unpersist data structures for address sets.
>
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 03:22:45PM
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 03:22:45PM +, Ryan Moats wrote:
> With the removal of incremental processing, it is no longer
> necessary to persist the data structures for storing address
> sets. Simplify things by removing this complexity.
>
> Side effect: fixed a memory leak in