lehn
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Pravin Shelar [mailto:pshe...@nicira.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2014 2:18 PM
> To: Polehn, Mike A
> Cc: dev@openvswitch.org
> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] PATCH [1/1] High speed PMD physical NIC queue size,
> resubmit
>
> On Thu,
Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] PATCH [1/1] High speed PMD physical NIC queue size,
resubmit
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 7:08 AM, Polehn, Mike A wrote:
> (n*32<4096) is the formula for calculating the buffer size. The
> maximum size is not
> 4096 but 4096 - 32 = 4064. I ran into this issue on
nesday, June 25, 2014 4:19 PM
> To: Polehn, Mike A
> Cc: dev@openvswitch.org
> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] PATCH [1/1] High speed PMD physical NIC queue size,
> resubmit
>
> On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 3:58 PM, Polehn, Mike A
> wrote:
>> Large TX and RX queues are needed for high
ver.
Mike Polehn
-Original Message-
From: Pravin Shelar [mailto:pshe...@nicira.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2014 4:19 PM
To: Polehn, Mike A
Cc: dev@openvswitch.org
Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] PATCH [1/1] High speed PMD physical NIC queue size,
resubmit
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 3:58 PM, Pol
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 3:58 PM, Polehn, Mike A wrote:
> Large TX and RX queues are needed for high speed 10 GbE physical NICS.
> Observed a 250% zero loss improvement over small NIC queue test for
> A port to port flow test.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mike A. Polehn
I am fine with the
>
> diff --git a/l
gt; From: Ben Pfaff [mailto:b...@nicira.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 8:50 AM
> To: Polehn, Mike A
> Cc: dev@openvswitch.org
> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] PATCH [1/1] High speed PMD physical NIC queue size,
> resubmit
>
> On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 10:58:26PM +, Polehn, Mike A wr
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 10:58:26PM +, Polehn, Mike A wrote:
> Large TX and RX queues are needed for high speed 10 GbE physical NICS.
> Observed a 250% zero loss improvement over small NIC queue test for
> A port to port flow test.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mike A. Polehn
Please be more careful wit
Large TX and RX queues are needed for high speed 10 GbE physical NICS.
Observed a 250% zero loss improvement over small NIC queue test for
A port to port flow test.
Signed-off-by: Mike A. Polehn
diff --git a/lib/netdev-dpdk.c b/lib/netdev-dpdk.c
index fbdb6b3..d1bcc73 100644
--- a/lib/netdev-dp
