Hello,
Need some help in configuring flow table eviction group.
I tried to configure the eviction group, but i am seeing some warn/errors
and didn't come across any sample commands in web.
1. Can you please share some sample commands for passing NXM_OF_IN_PORT[]
as an argument to flow_table, over
Hello,
i am getting "EAL: pci_map_resource(): cannot mmap(18, 0x7f504000,
0x8, 0x0): Invalid argument (0x)" when i start
ovs-vswitchd.
Setup:DL360gen8 CPU:E5-2967 NIC:82599ES 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+ (2 Port) (PCI:
slot0: 04:00.0 04:00.1)
Kernel: 4.6.4-201.fc23.x86_64 ixgbe dri
v [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Kapil
> >Adhikesavalu
> >Sent: Sunday, July 31, 2016 1:30 PM
> >To: [email protected]; [email protected]
> >Subject: [ovs-dev] OVS+DPDK: pci_map_resource(): cannot mmap error
> >
> >Hello,
> &
Hi,
Want to check if there is an alternate way to append a output port to the
existing flow.
For example,
Existing flow:
cookie=0x0, duration=14279.412s, table=0, n_packets=0, n_bytes=0,
idle_age=14316, dl_vlan=5 actions=output:2
If I want to add output:4 to the above flow, the only way
16 9:54 PM, "Ben Pfaff" wrote:
On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 04:49:49PM +0530, Kapil Adhikesavalu wrote:
> Want to check if there is an alternate way to append a output port to the
> existing flow.
>
>
>
> For example,
>
>
>
> Existing flow:
>
> cookie=0
Hi,
On a Intel xeon E5-2697 chip with iommu turned on with Intel NIC 82599, i
am getting the following error while doing the NIC binding using VFIO.
kernel: 4.23 fedora 23, i haven't tried the latest kernel yet.
E5-2697 supports IOMMU VT-d, does
VFIO NIC binding steps,
modprobe vfio-pci
sudo /u
> >From: discuss [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Kapil
> >Adhikesavalu
> >Sent: Tuesday, August 9, 2016 10:46 AM
> >To: [email protected]; [email protected]
> >Subject: [ovs-discuss] OVS DPDK VFIO error
> >
> >Hi,
> &
Hi,
is there a way to get notification on MACs learnt on a OVS bridge ?
i am looking for a way to get the results available in "ovs-appctl fdb/show
" as a notification/subscription. i took a brief look at IDL, but
didn't find where will the MAC info will be internally stored to write a
monitor A
Hi,
i have the following flow rule,
*tun_id=0xfa0,in_port=10 actions=mod_vlan_vid:1,resubmit(0,2),resubmit(0,1)*
and i need to know in which order actions will be performed.
will the actions be performed in the s*ame order as mentioned* in the flow
? like
1. Modify VLAN as 1
2. then resubmit m
Hi,
is there a limit on maximum number of patch ports between bridges ?
Thanks
Kapil.
___
dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
eable performance difference between using action
NORMAL and LEARN. Assuming there wouldn't be too much MAC movement.
Thanks
Kapil
On 02-Jul-2016 6:27 AM, "Ben Pfaff" wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 07:21:53PM +0530, Kapil Adhikesavalu wrote:
> > is there a way to get notific
Hi,
Can OVS supports priority queues.Meaning, any packet comes with .1p high
priority send to High priority Queues. I couldn't find this info from the
available docs.
The requirement was to send all network control packets to high priority
queue.Even if Data traffic comes with high rate, the netwo
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 07:00:23AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 06:53:31PM +0530, Kapil Adhikesavalu wrote:
> > > Can OVS supports priority queues.Meaning, any packet comes with .1p
> high
> > > priority send to High priority Queues. I coul
Hello,
OVS + DPDK provides a way to configure multiqueue for dpdk ports (in turn
vhost user ports as well).
ovs-vsctl set Open_vSwitch . other_config:pmd-cpu-mask=c
ovs-vsctl set Interface dpdk0 options:n_rxq=2
ovs-vsctl set Interface dpdk1 options:n_rxq=2
Based on what parameter, the packets
Hello,
Is VHost port - per queue rate limiting feature expected in near future ?
Currently its on port basis, and if we assign more than 1 queue to the
vHost port, it will be good to do QOS on per queue.
https://github.com/openvswitch/ovs/blob/master/INSTALL.DPDK-ADVANCED.md
7. QOS
Here is an
Hi,
Is there a way to configure MTU for dpdk and vhost ports from its default
1500 ?
I read, "with OVS, Normally the MTU should be changed using operating
system specific interfaces (e.g. ifconfig).", but as they are dpdk ports,
how can i configure them ?
Regards
Kapil
___
Thanks Mark, just figured that myself, i wasn't using the latest OVS, so
mtu_request wasn't working.. Appreciate your help.
Regards
Kapil.
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 8:47 PM, Kavanagh, Mark B wrote:
> >
> >Hi,
> >
> >Is there a way to configure MTU for dpdk and vhost ports from its default
> 1500
Hi,
1. in INSTALL.DPDK.md, huge page size is recommended as 2MB pages. Earlier
i remember seeing some reference to use 1GB huge pages. is there any
noticeable performance improvement in using 1G hugepages vs 2M pages ?
2. is there a way to allocate 1G hugepages using sysctl. Default hugepage
size
Hi Bhanuprakash,
Thanks for the info. Helpful!
Regards
Kapil.
On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 5:41 PM, Bodireddy, Bhanuprakash <
[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >-Original Message-
> >From: dev [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Kapil
> >A
Hi,
In a PHY-VM-PHY setup, i was using dpdk16.04 + OVS 2.5.90 + qemu 2.4.1,
everything was working fine.
When i upgraded to dpdk 16.07 + ovs 2.6 (branch-2.6) without any change to
the setup/configuration; now all the packets(1200B) are getting dropped at
vhostuser ports. Though, i am able to send
changed but no OVS
> change. We need to narrow down the issue. From my knowledge, qemu-2.4.1 is
> fine for the case.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Kapil
> Adhikesavalu
> Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2016 2:18 PM
>
), So while
creating the dpdk interface through ovs, will i able to modify ovs code to
pass the default mtu size as 2000 and create the dpdk port ?
Regards
Kapil
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 8:30 PM, Kapil Adhikesavalu
wrote:
> There seem to be some version dependency between the two.
> dpdk-16.0
Hi,
Issue Setup: DPDK 16.07 + OVS 2.6.0 + qemu 2.4.1 : PHY-VM-PHY
I am trying to upgrade from (DPDK16.04 + OVS2.5.9), to (DPDK16.07 +
OVS2.6.0) for jumbo frame support. After the upgrade, all packets are
getting dropped on the vhostuser port.
The dpdk/vhost user ports used here has default MTU o
Hi Mark,
This commit is already part of 2.6.0 that i am using. Also, when i create
an port with mtu_request, it is creating with the expected mtu, no problems
here.
The issue i am facing is, i am not even able to run traffic through a
PHY-VM-PHY with the default MTU (mtu_request not used).
I am j
Thanks Mark, I will check this.
I am not using multi-queue and from this thread, they have already added a
change in OVS to support older version of QEMU(queue 0 is enabled in OVS
even if qemu doesnt send VRING_ENABLE), which is what helped me to use qemu
2.4.1 till OVS 2.5.9. are these threads re
25 matches
Mail list logo
