[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-239?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12802137#action_12802137
]
Matthias Weßendorf commented on OWB-239:
discussion thread:
http://www.mail-archive.c
On Jan 19, 2010, at 7:57 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
I have looked,
https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots-group/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec/1.0-SNAPSHOT/
.
It is correct now.
But
There are two versions of interceptor specification in the repo,
1.0.0-EA1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-239?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Struberg reopened OWB-239:
---
As of section 3.3.8:
> The default name for a producer method is the method name, unless the method
> follo
Hi Mark;
why do you reopen this issue?
--Gurkan
2010/1/19 Mark Struberg (JIRA)
>
> [
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-239?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel]
>
> Mark Struberg reopened OWB-239:
> ---
>
>
> As of section
>>>Do you know what the status is on the JCDI library with regards to the
TCK?
I have been working with TCK and it seems that there is no problem so far.
--Gurkan
2010/1/19 David Blevins
>
> On Jan 19, 2010, at 7:57 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
>
> I have looked,
>>
>>
>> https://repository.apach
As I stated, given example commented on the JIRA is not valid. Please read
my other comments.
2010/1/19 Gurkan Erdogdu
> Hi Mark;
>
> why do you reopen this issue?
>
> --Gurkan
>
> 2010/1/19 Mark Struberg (JIRA)
>
>
>> [
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-239?page=com.atlassian.ji
I currently have a funny issue in my company with @Named producer methods which
is very similar (but via EL) thus I reopened it to not forget to check that the
default name works.
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Tue, 1/19/10, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
> From: Gurkan Erdogdu
> Subject: Re: [jira] Reopened:
Lets ignore the @Inject @Named for a minute, as I think it is distracting
from the main issue of the producer methods default name.
If I have a bean with a producer field:
@Produces @Named Products getProducts()
You would agree its el-name should be "products" and I should be able to
reference i
Yes, it works! I have tried it.
2010/1/19 Joseph Bergmark
> Lets ignore the @Inject @Named for a minute, as I think it is distracting
> from the main issue of the producer methods default name.
>
> If I have a bean with a producer field:
>
> @Produces @Named Products getProducts()
>
> You would
OK. But, could you create a new issue with your problem and closing this? It
will be more manageable.
Thanks;
--Gurkan
2010/1/19 Mark Struberg
> I currently have a funny issue in my company with @Named producer methods
> which is very similar (but via EL) thus I reopened it to not forget to ch
Awesome, thanks for the clarification!
Sincerely,
Joe
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 8:31 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
> Yes, it works! I have tried it.
>
> 2010/1/19 Joseph Bergmark
>
> > Lets ignore the @Inject @Named for a minute, as I think it is distracting
> > from the main issue of the producer m
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-239?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gurkan Erdogdu closed OWB-239.
--
Resolution: Won't Fix
> JavaBeans property getter naming convention with Producer Methods gives
> Unsatis
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-215?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gurkan Erdogdu closed OWB-215.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: M4
> after leaving the incubator a new location for the site needs
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-237?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gurkan Erdogdu updated OWB-237:
---
Priority: Minor (was: Critical)
Affects Version/s: (was: 1.0.0)
14 matches
Mail list logo