[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-444?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12901089#action_12901089
]
Mark Struberg commented on OWB-444:
---
Maybe my proposal was not yet clear enough: I like to k
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-444?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12901085#action_12901085
]
Gurkan Erdogdu commented on OWB-444:
What is the difference to call our singletons from We
+1
regards,
gerhard
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
2010/8/21 Mark Struberg
> given the fact that Gurkan currently refactors a few core components I'd
> now
> also in favour to -
given the fact that Gurkan currently refactors a few core components I'd now
also in favour to -alpha-2. We can then test this release a few weeks and go
for
1.0.0 with only applying bugfixes.
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message
> From: Gerhard
> To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
> Sen
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-444?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12901032#action_12901032
]
Mark Struberg commented on OWB-444:
---
Thought about this already, but I think this would have
+1 for alpha2 (or beta1)
regards,
gerhard
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
2010/8/21 Mark Struberg
> I could also release an -alpha-2, but given the fact that our code is
> curren
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-444?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12901031#action_12901031
]
Gurkan Erdogdu commented on OWB-444:
I am thinking to change important utility classes to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-444?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12901030#action_12901030
]
Gurkan Erdogdu commented on OWB-444:
I have committed some changes to loggers, (those are
puh, txs Gurkan :)
But I think we cannot continue with the release process today before we haven't
retested it carefully.
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message
> From: Gurkan Erdogdu
> To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
> Sent: Sat, August 21, 2010 4:16:37 PM
> Subject: Re: svn commit: r9
What I have done is not related with our revamping design, because I did not
touch static utitliy classes' loggers. I have just changed the non-static
classes loggers because those must not be static. In multi-class loader shared
environments, static loggers do not work!
___
Do not worry! This is not final yet! I will work on
From: Mark Struberg
To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
Sent: Sat, August 21, 2010 5:11:14 PM
Subject: Re: svn commit: r987758 - in /openwebbeans/trunk:
webbeans-ejb/src/main/java/org/apache/webbeans/ejb/common/i
Gurkan, please rollback this change. This has a HEAVY backdraft on performance
and overall stability! Creating a Logger is a _very_ expensive task and will
slow down our performance to about 50%!
This problem must imo get solved by completely revamping our design and move
the
utils under the c
I could also release an -alpha-2, but given the fact that our code is currently
pretty stable otherwise, I'd prefer 1.0.0 and later ship a 1.0.1 and if all
those things are fixed a 1.1.0. To be honest - I pretty much don't care about
the version number as long as we ship something working in the
i would prefer a v1 which fixes e.g. OWB-338 and OWB-444.
regards,
gerhard
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
2010/8/21 Mark Struberg
> Hoi
>
> I'd like to prepare the OWB-1.0.0 rel
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-444?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12901004#action_12901004
]
Mark Struberg commented on OWB-444:
---
I think I already commented on removing most of our sta
Hoi
I'd like to prepare the OWB-1.0.0 release today, any Jiras open which you like
to resolve before?
Is all well tested and the quality didn't suffer in the last days?
LieGrue,
strub
16 matches
Mail list logo
