Re: Proxy problems

2010-12-06 Thread David Jencks
On Dec 6, 2010, at 11:02 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote: > Hello David, > > I understand that some classloader problems have been occured on an OSGI > based > application/server. As I tried to indicate in my post, these problems will occur in any environment that tries to isolate application and s

Re: Proxy problems

2010-12-06 Thread Gurkan Erdogdu
Hello David, I understand that some classloader problems have been occured on an OSGI based application/server. Using javassist was decided at the start of the project. All OWB modules have been implemented/updated with respect to javassist usage. Therefore it may not possible to remove javass

Re: Yan:: svn commit: r1042754 - /openwebbeans/trunk/webbeans-jsf/src/main/resources/META-INF/faces-config.xml

2010-12-06 Thread Gurkan Erdogdu
Hello David, Reason of installing OwbApplication is that after evaulating EL expression, you must destroy all dependent instances using in EL expression. (See specification section 6.4.3, Dependent Pseudo-scope and Unified EL). Therefore we have to implement our own ValueExpression class. Our c

Proxy problems

2010-12-06 Thread David Jencks
I think there might be a problem with using javassist to build proxies. jsr299 allows proxying default or package access classes. A very definite although hard-to-find-the-documentation-for requirement of classloaders is that all the default access classes and subclasses of default access cla

Re: Yan:: svn commit: r1042754 - /openwebbeans/trunk/webbeans-jsf/src/main/resources/META-INF/faces-config.xml

2010-12-06 Thread David Jencks
Irrespective of what happens to this commit, do you see any spec support for installing OwbApplicationFactory for every jsf-aware web beans app? AFAICT there is none and installing it is a convenience for users that they may or may not want. If you see something in the spec contrary to this I

Yan:: svn commit: r1042754 - /openwebbeans/trunk/webbeans-jsf/src/main/resources/META-INF/faces-config.xml

2010-12-06 Thread Gurkan Erdogdu
Hi David we designed owb as a plugin way. When he wants to add jsf support, he simply drops webeansjsf.jar into classpath. Removing factory from faces config prohibits it. Therefore this issue must be resolved on geronimo side instead of owb site. moreover, not every jsf application must be assu

[jira] Commented: (OWB-505) OwbApplicationFactory should not be installed by default

2010-12-06 Thread David Jencks (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-505?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12967465#action_12967465 ] David Jencks commented on OWB-505: -- rev 1042754. Not resolving for easier review. > OwbAppl

[jira] Created: (OWB-505) OwbApplicationFactory should not be installed by default

2010-12-06 Thread David Jencks (JIRA)
OwbApplicationFactory should not be installed by default Key: OWB-505 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-505 Project: OpenWebBeans Issue Type: Bug Components: Cor

[jira] Resolved: (OWB-504) OwbApplicationFactory getWrapped should return wrapped application factory

2010-12-06 Thread David Jencks (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] David Jencks resolved OWB-504. -- Resolution: Fixed rev 1042752 > OwbApplicationFactory getWrapped should return wrapped application factor

[jira] Created: (OWB-504) OwbApplicationFactory getWrapped should return wrapped application factory

2010-12-06 Thread David Jencks (JIRA)
OwbApplicationFactory getWrapped should return wrapped application factory -- Key: OWB-504 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-504 Project: OpenWebBeans Issue