Hi
I have opened a JIRA issue, https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDITCK-199
>>>Is it to fail the most recent tck and ignore the problem?
No. Passing TCK is always higher priority...
Thanks;
--Gurkan
- Original Message
From: David Jencks
To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
Sent: Wed, De
IMO the changes committed to the tck for CDITCK-174 require the changes I
committed to OWB in order to pass. The changes in the tck for CDITCk-174 are
still present in the 1.0.2.SP1 tck. If you think these contradict the javadoc
can you file a new CDITCK jira or reopen CDITCK-174 or take some
David, as clarified by the JSP EC, API Javadocs are _always_ correct if there
is any question or discrepance with the written spec.
I have not looked at the Javadoc, but please also check the corresponding
CDI-TCK-174
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDITCK-174
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Tue, 12/1
Since there's a new released tck that doesn't change or exclude the tests in
question, I tend to think that current opinion in the cdi EG is that the
javadoc is wrong. Can you take this up with pete to find out what's going on?
Meanwhile I would think there would be some interest in passing th
As pete mail, javadoc is correct therefore i reverted change before. If javadoc
is correct those tck tests must be excluded. our code is correct because it is
aligned with published javadoc
Sal, 14 Ara 2010 20:51 EET tarihinde djen...@apache.org şöyle yazdı:
>Author: djencks
>Date: Tue Dec 14 1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-490?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12971378#action_12971378
]
Mark Struberg commented on OWB-490:
---
it's pretty easy: the API which got published in the Ja
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-490?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12971371#action_12971371
]
David Jencks commented on OWB-490:
--
I reapplied rev 1034955 in rev 1049215 as the 1.0.2.SP1 t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-490?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12971357#action_12971357
]
David Jencks commented on OWB-490:
--
Gurkan reverted rev 1034955 in rev 1038667 and 1038669
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-493?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12971351#action_12971351
]
David Jencks commented on OWB-493:
--
I'm seeing these errors in the recently released 1.0.2.SP
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-490?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12971346#action_12971346
]
David Jencks commented on OWB-490:
--
There's a new 1.0.2.SP1 cdi tck available and these tests
10 matches
Mail list logo
