Hi
Time to report. I have written March 2012 at
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OWB/June2012
Please have a look and add/update/delete?
Thanks,
Gurkan
Romain Manni-Bucau created OWB-674:
--
Summary: rewrite owb logger api
Key: OWB-674
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-674
Project: OpenWebBeans
Issue Type: Improvement
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-674?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Romain Manni-Bucau updated OWB-674:
---
Description:
Currently the OWB logging facade is pretty useless since it only supports JUL.
It
Hi,
just created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-674
any thought about it?
the goal is mainly to allow to use something else than JUL. The proposed
patch uses a system property but it can be something else.
The other topic of this jira is the usage of getStackTrace() in the JUL
+1
The getStackTrace only hits us if we throw an Exception, right? The problem is
that due to the additional wrapper handler we always have a 'mismatch' in the
StackTrace...
I'm tempted to move to native jul anyway...
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
From: Romain Manni-Bucau
no:
private void wblLog(Level level, String messageKey)
{
if (logger.isLoggable(level))
{
logger.logp(level, caller.getName(),
Thread.currentThread().getStackTrace()[3].getMethodName(), messageKey);
}
}
well if we move to natve JUL we'll need to keep a
perfectly fine.
txs and LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
From: Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com
To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 9:50 AM
Subject: June 2012 Board Report
Hi
Time to report. I have written
