Re: javassist removal

Hi, sounds like you have something similar to commons-proxy [1] in mind, when creating an abstraction of the proxy class generation library. Have you already considered using it? br, Sven [1] https://commons.apache.org/proxy/ 2012/8/9 David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com: Hey All, Heads

Re: Classpath Scanner proposal

other apache projects. But we'll do that after 1.1.0 ;) txs and LieGrue, strub --- On Mon, 3/21/11, Sven Linstaedt sven.linsta...@googlemail.com wrote: From: Sven Linstaedt sven.linsta...@googlemail.com Subject: Re: Classpath Scanner proposal To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org Date

Re: Classpath Scanner proposal

Another interesting use case would look like using some kind of pre-generated scanning information created during build-time. Artifacts are in general considered final after creation, so scans done at runtime will return the same result. This result could be generated during build-time and

Re: attention - danger zone ;)

storage. This is now exactly as it is defined in the spec! ad 4.) exactly! LieGrue, strub --- Sven Linstaedt sven.linsta...@googlemail.com schrieb am Di, 23.3.2010: Von: Sven Linstaedt sven.linsta...@googlemail.com Betreff: Re: attention - danger zone ;) An: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org

[jira] Commented: (OWB-334) cid is missing when using redirect for a jsf 2.0 application

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-334?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12848779#action_12848779 ] Sven Linstaedt commented on OWB-334: Sounds reasonalbe. I have not checked other

Re: attention - danger zone ;)

Hi Mark, just for my personal understanding: The proposed changes imply: 1. Introducing two seperate MethodHandler. One for resolving NormalScope beans to the actual instance. Another one for applying the interception/decoration stack. 2. As only one MethodHandler can be attached to proxy class

Re: Java EE Independent Core

Call me ignorant, but what is dom4j good for? ;) Afaik beans.xml schema is not very complex. Is there other xml we need to parse, besides this one? Otherwise I would like to suggest using jre built in dom or sax parsers. wdyt? Besides this one: I appreciate your idea, so +1 br, Sven 2010/2/26

Re: Java EE Independent Core

Standard Parsers instead of Dom4j. This probably will be done after releasing M4. Thanks; --Gurkan 2010/2/26 Sven Linstaedt sven.linsta...@googlemail.com Call me ignorant, but what is dom4j good for? ;) Afaik beans.xml schema is not very complex. Is there other xml we need to parse, besides

Re: Java EE Independent Core

jar in there somewhere. 2010/2/26 Sven Linstaedt sven.linsta...@googlemail.com: I will create a issue for this task. br, Sven 2010/2/26 Gurkan Erdogdu cgurkanerdo...@gmail.com Hi Sven; Actually I have used dom4j to parse more complex XML

Re: transitive interceptor bindings

Afaik @Inherited is only applied to annotation resolution if one uses the reflection API. I am not aware of this annotation also being checked for interceptor resolution. So as @Binding1 is @Inherited, both interceptors are applied to Child imho. If @Binding1 was not @Inherited, Child

Re: About (OWB-251) Proxies created with JavassistProxyFactory do not intercept private functions

In addition I am not aware of any other framework , that uses cglib instead of aspectj and is able to intercept private methods. From a technical point of view this should be impossible. br, Sven 2010/1/25 Gurkan Erdogdu cgurkanerdo...@gmail.com Also, interceptors are applied to business

[jira] Commented: (OWB-251) Proxies created with JavassistProxyFactory do not intercept private functions

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-251?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12804252#action_12804252 ] Sven Linstaedt commented on OWB-251: As far as I remember, the EL specs also says