Re: Classpath Scanner proposal

2011-03-27 Thread David Blevins
and synchronizing it will get you bottlenecks. That's the part I try and stay away from. -David > > From: David Blevins > To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org > Sent: Fri, March 25, 2011 7:54:28 AM > Subject: Re: Classpath Scanner proposal >

Re: Classpath Scanner proposal

2011-03-25 Thread Mark Struberg
ed the synchronized blocks in our CreationalContextImpl and a few other bugs, the improvement would have been even much higher. LieGrue, strub --- On Fri, 3/25/11, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote: > From: Gurkan Erdogdu > Subject: Re: Classpath Scanner proposal > To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.o

Re: Classpath Scanner proposal

2011-03-25 Thread Gurkan Erdogdu
. From: David Blevins To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org Sent: Fri, March 25, 2011 7:54:28 AM Subject: Re: Classpath Scanner proposal On Mar 24, 2011, at 12:22 PM, Mark Struberg wrote: > I'd like to cook up something for a JSR, but need some more time. > David wrote x

Re: Classpath Scanner proposal

2011-03-24 Thread David Blevins
re tests or delete some more code :) I'm sure it will be some of both. -David > --- On Thu, 3/24/11, Sven Linstaedt wrote: > >> From: Sven Linstaedt >> Subject: Re: Classpath Scanner proposal >> To: "dev@openwebbeans.apache.org" >> Date: Thursday,

Re: Classpath Scanner proposal

2011-03-24 Thread Mark Struberg
Sven Linstaedt wrote: > From: Sven Linstaedt > Subject: Re: Classpath Scanner proposal > To: "dev@openwebbeans.apache.org" > Date: Thursday, March 24, 2011, 7:09 PM > Hi Mark, > > that sounds absolutely reasonable. I am just interested in > the state of progre

Re: Classpath Scanner proposal

2011-03-24 Thread Sven Linstaedt
ng used in geronimo and a few other > apache projects. But we'll do that after 1.1.0 ;) > > txs and LieGrue, > strub > > --- On Mon, 3/21/11, Sven Linstaedt wrote: > >> From: Sven Linstaedt >> Subject: Re: Classpath Scanner proposal >> To: dev@openwebb

Re: Classpath Scanner proposal

2011-03-21 Thread Mark Struberg
--- On Mon, 3/21/11, Sven Linstaedt wrote: > From: Sven Linstaedt > Subject: Re: Classpath Scanner proposal > To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org > Date: Monday, March 21, 2011, 5:35 PM > Another interesting use case would > look like using some kind of > pre-generated scan

Re: Classpath Scanner proposal

2011-03-21 Thread Sven Linstaedt
; > > From: Jan-Kees van Andel > > Subject: Re: Classpath Scanner proposal > > To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org, d...@geronimo.apache.org > > Date: Sunday, February 27, 2011, 1:35 PM > > +1, although I think Jar hell is a > > real issue. Think about libraries like &

Re: Classpath Scanner proposal

2011-02-27 Thread Shawn Jiang
+1 only once. On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 7:36 PM, Mark Struberg wrote: > hi folks! > > Since I'm tired of waiting for my EE stack to startup because each and > every library implements it's own classpath scanner over and over again, I > thought about introducing a proposal for a framework which al

Re: Classpath Scanner proposal

2011-02-27 Thread Mark Struberg
: > From: Jan-Kees van Andel > Subject: Re: Classpath Scanner proposal > To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org, d...@geronimo.apache.org > Date: Sunday, February 27, 2011, 1:35 PM > +1, although I think Jar hell is a > real issue. Think about libraries like > cglib, asm or commons-

Re: Classpath Scanner proposal

2011-02-27 Thread Gerhard
1/2/27 Mark Struberg > > > Hi Jan-Kees! > > > > Txs for this info! > > > > Of course, I think the downside of getting another dependency to myfaces > > would highly be outvalued by the benefit we'd gain from it :) > > > > LieGrue, > &

Re: Classpath Scanner proposal

2011-02-27 Thread Jan-Kees van Andel
i Jan-Kees! > > Txs for this info! > > Of course, I think the downside of getting another dependency to myfaces > would highly be outvalued by the benefit we'd gain from it :) > > LieGrue, > strub > > --- On Sun, 2/27/11, Jan-Kees van Andel wrote: > > > From

Re: Classpath Scanner proposal

2011-02-27 Thread Mark Struberg
; > personally don't know xbean-finder well enough, I just > started hacking on a > > scannotation based one (similar to the one we use in > OpenWebBeans). > > > > > > LieGrue, > > strub > > > > --- On Sun, 2/27/11, Ivan > wrote: > &g

Re: Classpath Scanner proposal

2011-02-27 Thread Jan-Kees van Andel
annotation based one (similar to the one we use in OpenWebBeans). > > > LieGrue, > strub > > --- On Sun, 2/27/11, Ivan wrote: > > > From: Ivan > > Subject: Re: Classpath Scanner proposal > > To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org, d...@geronimo.apache.org > > Date: Su

Re: Classpath Scanner proposal

2011-02-27 Thread Mark Struberg
enWebBeans). LieGrue, strub --- On Sun, 2/27/11, Ivan wrote: > From: Ivan > Subject: Re: Classpath Scanner proposal > To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org, d...@geronimo.apache.org > Date: Sunday, February 27, 2011, 12:01 PM > Totally agree the idea, in Geronimo, > it is

Re: Classpath Scanner proposal

2011-02-27 Thread Ivan
Totally agree the idea, in Geronimo, it is definitely an issue, as many components need to scan the target application, and we are trying to improve this, e,g. In the xbean-finder, we use some filter to limit the scanning scope. Also, we hope to have a sharable annotation scanning tool, and open a

Classpath Scanner proposal

2011-02-27 Thread Mark Struberg
hi folks! Since I'm tired of waiting for my EE stack to startup because each and every library implements it's own classpath scanner over and over again, I thought about introducing a proposal for a framework which allows to first register 'ScanJobs' and then just does all the necessary classpa