om: Gerhard Petracek
> > To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
> > Cc:
> > Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2013 9:05 PM
> > Subject: Re: Yan: CDI 1.0 TCK Problem + validatePassivationDependencies
> >
> > hi @ all,
> >
> > we also have other parts which are require
uld not make a session scoped EM, but thats another story...
>>
>>
>> - Original Message -
>> > From: Mark Struberg
>> > To: "dev@openwebbeans.apache.org"
>
>> > Cc:
>> > Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 1:10 P
LieGrue,
> strub
>
> PS: I would not make a session scoped EM, but thats another story...
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: Mark Struberg
> > To: "dev@openwebbeans.apache.org"
> > Cc:
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 1:10 PM
>
.apache.org"
> Cc:
> Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 1:10 PM
> Subject: Re: Yan: CDI 1.0 TCK Problem + validatePassivationDependencies
>
> Don't you remember how many tests we challenged/excluded until the TCK was
> finally ok?
> Well, this is another of those is
rg" ; Mark Struberg
>
>Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 11:23 AM
>Subject: Yan: CDI 1.0 TCK Problem + validatePassivationDependencies
>
>
>Hi Mark
>
>1.1.8 branch
>
>
>
>Broken means that it is not necessary to pass this in TCK for CDI
Hi Mark
1.1.8 branch
Broken means that it is not necessary to pass this in TCK for CDI 1.0, why this
test exist in TCK?
Thks.
Gurkan
Kimden: Mark Struberg
Kime: "dev@openwebbeans.apache.org"
Gönderildiği Tarih: 9 Nis 2013 21:47 Salı
Konu: Re: CDI 1.0 T
