[jira] Created: (OWB-262) Beans defined via TextContext XML get added twice

Beans defined via TextContext XML get added twice -- Key: OWB-262 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-262 Project: OpenWebBeans Issue Type: Bug Components: XML

[jira] Resolved: (OWB-261) Implement BeanManager#getPassivationCapableBean(String id)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-261?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Struberg resolved OWB-261. --- Resolution: Fixed Implement BeanManager#getPassivationCapableBean(String id)

[jira] Resolved: (OWB-262) Beans defined via TextContext XML get added twice

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-262?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Struberg resolved OWB-262. --- Resolution: Fixed Beans defined via TextContext XML get added twice

[jira] Commented: (OWB-6) Scope passivation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-6?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12829584#action_12829584 ] Mark Struberg commented on OWB-6: - This is mostly covered by section 6.6 of the current spec

Difference between getComponents() and getBeans() in BeanManagerImpl?

Hi Gurkan! Is there a difference between getComponents() and getBeans() in BeanManagerImpl? I'd favour to drop getComponents... txs, strub __ Do You Yahoo!? Sie sind Spam leid? Yahoo! Mail verfügt über einen herausragenden Schutz gegen

Re: Difference between getComponents() and getBeans() in BeanManagerImpl?

yes, already dropped it. Will do the checkin in 30 mins approx. LieGrue, strub --- Gurkan Erdogdu cgurkanerdo...@gmail.com schrieb am Do, 4.2.2010: Von: Gurkan Erdogdu cgurkanerdo...@gmail.com Betreff: Re: Difference between getComponents() and getBeans() in BeanManagerImpl? An:

[AppEngine] OWB and MyFaces2

Hello, via twitter, I ran into this tutorial: http://in.relation.to/14203.lace Now I wonder, because of Ali's work: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2504 if there is some room for trying OWB/MyFaces in the cloud? Ali, any interest for a demo/guide ? :) -Matthias -- Matthias

transitive interceptor bindings

I'm looking into a potential interceptor problem where the proper behavior of transitive interceptor bindings wrt @Inherited is a bit unclear. Anyone care to venture a guess at the desired behavior? Parent.java: @Binding1 public class Parent { public void interceptme() { } ; }

[jira] Created: (OWB-264) Location of redirect in faces-config.xml files is causing warnings.

Location of redirect in faces-config.xml files is causing warnings. --- Key: OWB-264 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-264 Project: OpenWebBeans Issue Type:

Re: transitive interceptor bindings

Afaik @Inherited is only applied to annotation resolution if one uses the reflection API. I am not aware of this annotation also being checked for interceptor resolution. So as @Binding1 is @Inherited, both interceptors are applied to Child imho. If @Binding1 was not @Inherited, Child

Re: transitive interceptor bindings

On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 5:06 PM, Sven Linstaedt sven.linsta...@googlemail.com wrote: Afaik @Inherited is only applied to annotation resolution if one uses the reflection API. I am not aware of this annotation also being checked for interceptor resolution. So as @Binding1 is @Inherited, both

[jira] Updated: (OWB-265) Some of the resources in the bundle needed to be removed or updated.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-265?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Paul J. Reder updated OWB-265: -- Attachment: ResourceBundleUpdates.patch Some of the resources in the bundle needed to be removed or

[jira] Created: (OWB-266) transitive interceptor bindings not applied to Bean subclasses

transitive interceptor bindings not applied to Bean subclasses -- Key: OWB-266 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-266 Project: OpenWebBeans Issue Type: Bug

[jira] Commented: (OWB-266) transitive interceptor bindings not applied to Bean subclasses

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-266?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12829886#action_12829886 ] Eric Covener commented on OWB-266: -- eek, X and Y intercept a class annotated with @A, but

[jira] Updated: (OWB-265) Some of the resources in the bundle needed to be removed or updated.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-265?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Paul J. Reder updated OWB-265: -- Attachment: ResourceBundleUpdates.patch Actually, I was slightly too aggressive in my removals in the

Re: transitive interceptor bindings

Hi Eric; I think that both @Binding2 and @Binding3 are inherited by sub-classes. @Inherited is used for getting annotations from subclass. @Binding1 is annotated with @Inherited therefore we must get @Binding1 and all its transitive interceptors @Binding2 and @Binding3. Your patch seems to