[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1004?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14158136#comment-14158136
]
Romain Manni-Bucau commented on OWB-1004:
-
it means there is no link with your
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1017?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Romain Manni-Bucau resolved OWB-1017.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.5.0
Assignee: Romain Manni-Bucau
here
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1021?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Romain Manni-Bucau resolved OWB-1021.
-
Resolution: Fixed
simple stackoverflow protection for TypeVariable
Romain Manni-Bucau created OWB-1021:
---
Summary: simple stackoverflow protection for TypeVariable
Key: OWB-1021
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1021
Project: OpenWebBeans
surely when we resolve the injection (normally in validate(beans) but
same method is called by bm.validation(injectionPoint)
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
should be ok now, issue was cache + maven classpath (jetty)
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-10-05 21:01 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu
before releasing do we add in openwebbeans.properties the list of
excluded jars like in tomee for instance? In TomEE we have a small
(;)) list here
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee/tomee/trunk/container/openejb-core/src/main/resources/default.exclusions
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter
Hi
I guess checkParametrizedType should be protected against loops since
you can be parameterized with yourself (stupid but not forbidden),
wdyt?
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
-- Forwarded
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1017?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14160933#comment-14160933
]
Romain Manni-Bucau commented on OWB-1017:
-
Good catch! should be fixed and I
proxies and
reset them when destroy is called.
I don't think it does worth it but it was mainly to share it since
ApplicationScopedBeanInterceptorHandler is still nice to use :).
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
same here but saw it in tomee, was mainly to share it ;)
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-10-12 19:17 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de:
Hi Romain!
Yes for the TCK we should probably switch
issue. We should use the application
loader and not the class one.
Do we introduce a SPI for it?
ProxyClassLoaderProvider#findClassLoader(Class) or something like
that?
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
in a previous jira issue [1].
LieGrue,
strub
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-931
On Sunday, 19 October 2014, 13:43, Romain Manni-Bucau
rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
tck uses arquillian so 80% of the time apps have an embedded
classloader around SW archive. Then OWB uses
2014-10-21 11:57 GMT+02:00 Howard W. Smith, Jr. smithh032...@gmail.com:
Wow, very impressive. I'm glad I'm using TomEE+ 1.7.1 (for now) and looking
forward to TomEE+ 2.x.
Questions below,
- OWB-1.5.0: 13 ms (no this is NOT a hoax, it's due to our proxy caching
[1]...)
All with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1013?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14185208#comment-14185208
]
Romain Manni-Bucau commented on OWB-1013:
-
Hi
you put a stack by thread? Sounds
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1013?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14185349#comment-14185349
]
Romain Manni-Bucau commented on OWB-1013:
-
The point is sync shouldn't be i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1027?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14202892#comment-14202892
]
Romain Manni-Bucau commented on OWB-1027:
-
-1, this is an API and each user can
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1027?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14208568#comment-14208568
]
Romain Manni-Bucau commented on OWB-1027:
-
Yep but once again that's not cause you
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1027?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14208674#comment-14208674
]
Romain Manni-Bucau commented on OWB-1027:
-
We dont use security service that much
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1027?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14208797#comment-14208797
]
Romain Manni-Bucau commented on OWB-1027:
-
Ok this is clearer, thks.
Debug part
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1027?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14209417#comment-14209417
]
Romain Manni-Bucau commented on OWB-1027:
-
About debug info generally doing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1027?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14209431#comment-14209431
]
Romain Manni-Bucau commented on OWB-1027:
-
Static would prevent allowing to use
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1027?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14209739#comment-14209739
]
Romain Manni-Bucau commented on OWB-1027:
-
@Meta ~= Stereotype but fully handled
+1
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-11-26 22:30 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de:
Hi!
I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-1.2.7.
This is a maintenance release
is not shocking) but I wonder if
that's a CDI/TCK issue or it is on our side
wdyt?
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
great, exactlt what I thought but was no more sure at all. Thanks Mark
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-12-14 9:59 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de:
I've created
https://issues.jboss.org
it?
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
FYI org.jboss.cdi.tck.tests.extensions.lifecycle.atd.AfterTypeDiscoveryTest
don't pass with OWB 1.5.0-SNAPSHOT
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-12-19 19:19 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu
Hmm
What would you have expected as description? This is part of cdi 1.1 impl
one - at least i thought
Le 19 déc. 2014 23:26, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de a écrit :
Romain, PLEASE create JIRAs for such tasks. We totally loose oversight
otherwise.
LieGrue,
strub
On Friday, 19
issue for it.
LieGrue,
strub
On Friday, 19 December 2014, 19:20, Romain Manni-Bucau
rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi guys,
is org.apache.webbeans.config.BeansDeployer#fireAfterTypeDiscoveryEvent
is not correctly implemented?
getXXX() should return list of enabled XXX but we
I'm on org.jboss.cdi.tck.tests.extensions.lifecycle.atd.AfterTypeDiscoveryTest
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-12-20 9:52 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de:
which test is this exactly
Hi
any reason we iterate over conversations to find the one from cId and
sessionId in
org.apache.webbeans.conversation.ConversationManager#getPropogatedConversation
and we don't use a ConversationId{cId, sessionId} key in a Map?
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http
Romain Manni-Bucau created OWB-1032:
---
Summary: create ProviderImpl (as an optimized InstanceImpl)
Key: OWB-1032
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1032
Project: OpenWebBeans
sure it should but shouldn't we use annotated type methods instead of
pure reflection?
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2015-02-12 14:41 GMT+01:00 Joseph Bergmark bergm...@gmail.com:
I need to write
Please revert you just broke all arquillian tests relying on a remote
container using OWB (tomee in my case)...and real use cases as well but not
yet hit it.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau https://twitter.com/rmannibucau | Blog
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com | Github https://github.com
DeploymentException instead then we
still have the problem with all the containing causes which are not
available on the client side (and thus will make the app fail with a
ClassNotFoundException).
LieGrue,
strub
On Saturday, 14 March 2015, 22:01, Romain Manni-Bucau
rmannibu...@gmail.com
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1032?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Romain Manni-Bucau updated OWB-1032:
Attachment: OWB-1032.patch
a patch for it but I fear it is not spec compliant since we need
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1032?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Romain Manni-Bucau resolved OWB-1032.
-
Resolution: Won't Fix
not spec compliant even if clearly underspecified :(
create
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1048?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14503545#comment-14503545
]
Romain Manni-Bucau commented on OWB-1048:
-
@Mark: exactly, which is not the case
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1054?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14502462#comment-14502462
]
Romain Manni-Bucau commented on OWB-1054:
-
Get it. I d use a size limited cache
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1057?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14504848#comment-14504848
]
Romain Manni-Bucau commented on OWB-1057:
-
Hi
seems fixed on 1.5, can you confirm
Le 25 avr. 2015 21:58, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de a écrit :
Hi!
Should we add the WebBeansConfigurationListener (or later the two split
ones, see OWB-1055) into a web-fragment.xml inside our openwebbeasns-web
module?
Pro: no need to add any listener manually + we should be neatly able
don't see any harm in it. I guess the only loss is some
amount of
ordering control you might have had if you included it in the parent
web.xml directly.
On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 5:14 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
rmannibu...@gmail.com
wrote:
Le 25 avr. 2015 21:58, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de
We can/should drop t6 but not servlet 2.5
Not sure i get your comment. Servlet 2 or 3 doesnt change anything for us
Le 26 avr. 2015 16:33, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de a écrit :
Hi folks!
I wonder if we still like to support tomcat6 and servlet-2.5. We are
talking about technology which
%
ignored by servlet 2.5 containers. We can even support
HttpSessionIdListener (servlet 3.1) using a bit of reflection in
the initalizer I think.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau https://twitter.com/rmannibucau | Blog
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com | Github https://github.com/rmannibucau |
LinkedIn
hurt
On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 10:55 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
rmannibu...@gmail.com
wrote:
We can/should drop t6 but not servlet 2.5
Not sure i get your comment. Servlet 2 or 3 doesnt change anything for
us
Le 26 avr. 2015 16:33, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de a écrit :
Hi folks
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1048?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14503303#comment-14503303
]
Romain Manni-Bucau commented on OWB-1048:
-
@mark: this is the issue, it should
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1048?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14503284#comment-14503284
]
Romain Manni-Bucau commented on OWB-1048:
-
@Mark: if you put the whole map
2015-04-19 21:25 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de:
Hi folks!
First I want to say a BIG thanks to all the people wo made OWB-1.5.0
possible. It was quite a long walk, but we had tons of fun and the project,
the team and the community around it ist still amazing even after so many
well the good point of FO is that you have a flush at the end so
potentially a single remote touch. Not sure what's the usage, I know in
TomEE it is never used.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau https://twitter.com/rmannibucau | Blog
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com | Github https://github.com
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1057?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14506781#comment-14506781
]
Romain Manni-Bucau commented on OWB-1057:
-
It is fixed
CDI Events using
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1054?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14502429#comment-14502429
]
Romain Manni-Bucau commented on OWB-1054:
-
Where do we need it? Nowhere IMO since
+1
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau https://twitter.com/rmannibucau | Blog
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com | Github https://github.com/rmannibucau |
LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau | Tomitriber
http://www.tomitribe.com
2015-04-22 14:03 GMT+02:00 Thomas Andraschko
Hi Mark
Did you test on tomcat 8? Blind guess - ie not tested - is it doesnt work
cause init/destroy order is logical
-- Message transféré --
De : strub...@apache.org
Date : 27 avr. 2015 14:59
Objet : svn commit: r1676248 - in
/openwebbeans/trunk/webbeans-web/src/main/java:
:
for (int i = 0; i listeners.length; i++) {
int j = (listeners.length - 1) - i
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau https://twitter.com/rmannibucau | Blog
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com | Github https://github.com/rmannibucau |
LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau | Tomitriber
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1070?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14535054#comment-14535054
]
Romain Manni-Bucau commented on OWB-1070:
-
Supporting cdi conversation filter solves
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1070?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14535087#comment-14535087
]
Romain Manni-Bucau commented on OWB-1070:
-
Right idea is to get a filter
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1070?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14537097#comment-14537097
]
Romain Manni-Bucau commented on OWB-1070:
-
Well the issue only hits servlet
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1070?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14537167#comment-14537167
]
Romain Manni-Bucau commented on OWB-1070:
-
Well filters dont cost much at least
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1074?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14545173#comment-14545173
]
Romain Manni-Bucau commented on OWB-1074:
-
I think when we'll tackle it we should
+0
Le 9 avr. 2015 19:22, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de a écrit :
Hi!
Just became aware that we are still targeting java6 in trunk. But CDI-1.2
is Java7 per spec, so we should imo also upgrade the project to java7.
Any objections?
LieGrue,
strub
+1 and a big thank you!
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau https://twitter.com/rmannibucau | Blog
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com | Github https://github.com/rmannibucau |
LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau | Tomitriber
http://www.tomitribe.com
2015-04-09 20:36 GMT+02:00 Gerhard
+1
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau https://twitter.com/rmannibucau | Blog
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com | Github https://github.com/rmannibucau |
LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau | Tomitriber
http://www.tomitribe.com
2015-04-13 9:28 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1046?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14492120#comment-14492120
]
Romain Manni-Bucau commented on OWB-1046:
-
If it can help, in TomEE we expect
@Howard: would have been cool ;). This is not intended to work so easily.
TomEE 2 does it.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau https://twitter.com/rmannibucau | Blog
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com | Github https://github.com/rmannibucau |
LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
it - the feature is quite not in the spec?
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau https://twitter.com/rmannibucau | Blog
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com | Github https://github.com/rmannibucau |
LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau | Tomitriber
http://www.tomitribe.com
+1
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau https://twitter.com/rmannibucau | Blog
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com | Github https://github.com/rmannibucau |
LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau | Tomitriber
http://www.tomitribe.com
2015-06-16 8:10 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de
PS: alternative is to fix the lifecycle between ProcessBeanAttributes and
ProcessInjectionPoint
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau https://twitter.com/rmannibucau | Blog
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com | Github https://github.com/rmannibucau |
LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
without any modification?
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau https://twitter.com/rmannibucau | Blog
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com | Github https://github.com/rmannibucau |
LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau | Tomitriber
http://www.tomitribe.com
). But the sample code relies on ProcessInjectionPoint
of ALL classes gets scanned before the first ProcessBeanAttributes get
fired.
LieGrue,
strub
Am 01.06.2015 um 09:58 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
:
@Mark: for which of 2 issue?
Agree spec is not 100% clean
Le 1 juin 2015 00
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1080?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14567268#comment-14567268
]
Romain Manni-Bucau commented on OWB-1080:
-
I am not sure. Using the class we proxy
@Mark: for which of 2 issue?
Agree spec is not 100% clean
Le 1 juin 2015 00:38, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de a écrit :
Can you plz create a JIRA issue?
LieGrue,
strub
Am 01.06.2015 um 03:51 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
:
PS: alternative is to fix
donąt (we fire them bean
by
bean).
I donąt think, our way is wrong from the spec point of view. If it is,
we
should fix it. Otherwise I tend to say, that the extension is not
portable.
Cheers,
Arne
Am 01.06.15 03:51 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau unter
rmannibu...@gmail.com:
PS
hehe when Mark says now it means he is running release:perform ;)
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau https://twitter.com/rmannibucau | Blog
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com | Github https://github.com/rmannibucau |
LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau | Tomitriber
http
+1
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau https://twitter.com/rmannibucau | Blog
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com | Github https://github.com/rmannibucau |
LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau | Tomitriber
http://www.tomitribe.com
2015-06-01 17:29 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1084?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14605454#comment-14605454
]
Romain Manni-Bucau commented on OWB-1084:
-
[~struberg] can you detail where
Romain Manni-Bucau created OWB-1084:
---
Summary: destory session event can used the wrong payload
Key: OWB-1084
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1084
Project: OpenWebBeans
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1084?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Romain Manni-Bucau resolved OWB-1084.
-
Resolution: Fixed
destory session event can used the wrong payload
jeano...@gmail.com:
+2 lol
Le lun. 17 août 2015 à 10:59, Arne Limburg
arne.limb...@openknowledge.de
a écrit :
+1
I hope, I¹ll find some time to help
Am 11.08.15 15:05 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau unter
rmannibu...@gmail.com:
Cant guarantee to help a lot now but +1. Would
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-757?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14645790#comment-14645790
]
Romain Manni-Bucau commented on OWB-757:
Side note: tomee fixed it updating
+1 and a big thank you to drive it!
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau https://twitter.com/rmannibucau | Blog
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com | Github https://github.com/rmannibucau |
LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau | Tomitriber
http://www.tomitribe.com
2015-07-29 1:44 GMT-07:00
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1084?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14645788#comment-14645788
]
Romain Manni-Bucau commented on OWB-1084:
-
Yes and TomEE is green using the snapshot
+1
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau https://twitter.com/rmannibucau | Blog
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com | Github https://github.com/rmannibucau |
LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau | Tomitriber
http://www.tomitribe.com
2015-08-07 14:22 GMT-07:00 Daniel Cunha daniels
Cant guarantee to help a lot now but +1. Would be nice to not identify spec
issues too late.
Le 11 août 2015 05:31, Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com a
écrit :
+1
regards,
gerhard
2015-08-11 13:58 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de:
Hi folks!
What about starting
; right submodule just too hard if you don’t know the project. And if you do
> then you don’t need it anyway.
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
> > Am 26.10.2015 um 21:16 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com
> >:
> >
> > Guess it is subjective enough to
Any separator works but it is nice to not just keep everything inlined
without hierarchy marker for multi module projects.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau>
img.org/a2b8x7e2x/asd.png
>
>
> 2015-10-26 20:25 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>:
>
> > Any separator works but it is nice to not just keep everything inlined
> > without hierarchy marker for multi module projects.
> >
> >
> > Roma
TomEE, Sirona, BatchEE, JCS, Johnzon, XBean to cite a few
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibuca
If you speak about mvn +1.
BTW I like [:: ]* pattern:
Apache OpenWebBeans
Apache OpenWebBeans :: Core
Apache OpenWebBeans :: Web
Apache OpenWebBeans :: JSF 2.2
...
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | G
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1095?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14961002#comment-14961002
]
Romain Manni-Bucau commented on OWB-1095:
-
[~struberg] we clear it between events (not all but you
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1095?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14960747#comment-14960747
]
Romain Manni-Bucau commented on OWB-1095:
-
[~gpetracek] empty is a valid cached value we have
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1095?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14960764#comment-14960764
]
Romain Manni-Bucau commented on OWB-1095:
-
even for non-empty values, anyway I guess we have a plan
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1092?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14803060#comment-14803060
]
Romain Manni-Bucau commented on OWB-1092:
-
Hi Paull,
the class has been intentionally removed, can
really a detail but can we name it jarExclusions or something like that?
beanScanningExcludes sounds close to what we have in beans.xml for me since
CDI 1.1 - ie exclude classes and not jars. Is it only me? is it relevant?
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |
dont want to fight on path (even if strictly speaking we just handle names
right?) but looks clearly less misleading :)
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau>
both work for me, pick the one you prefer :)
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
<http
Hi Emily,
conversations are now in the session so when the session is evicted
conversations are so no need of our own scheduler.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibu
looks good
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
<http://www.tomitribe.com>
2015-12-1
on why we removed it.
> Think it was either because it was slow or because spec/tck forced us. Not
> sure anymore.
> You could grab through the changes in svn.
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
> > Am 19.12.2015 um 13:56 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com
> >:
Le 19 déc. 2015 17:00, "Matt Benson" <gudnabr...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>
> On Dec 19, 2015 9:54 AM, "Romain Manni-Bucau" <rmannibu...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> >
> > Thought it was cause causing delegate init even in debug dtatement when
> >
401 - 500 of 2182 matches
Mail list logo
