[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-375?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12868282#action_12868282
]
James Carman commented on OWB-375:
--
I agree that this could speed up performance, but are you
Here's something that will solve your problem, use AspectJ.
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 2:51 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
Oki let me rephrase: I'd like to know if the spec (or Gavin) intends to
define this behaviour or if it is 'intentionally left undefined'.
LieGrue,
strub
---
Is there a portable way to resume conversations with OWB (or using the
standard API for that matter)? I would love to be able to write my
Wicket CDI support using the standard API, but so far I can't figure
out how to do that.
on the ConversationManager API
suggestion I mailed him about a few weeks ago ;-)
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 8:55 PM, James Carman
ja...@carmanconsulting.comwrote:
Is there a portable way to resume conversations with OWB (or using the
standard API for that matter)? I would love to be able to write my
portable interface :(
LieGrue,
strub
--- James Carman jcar...@carmanconsulting.com schrieb am Di, 30.3.2010:
Von: James Carman jcar...@carmanconsulting.com
Betreff: Re: Resuming Conversations...
An: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
Datum: Dienstag, 30. März, 2010 20:25 Uhr
Well, right now, I've got
Should I perhaps create a new class called WicketConversationService
which implements ConversationService? Would that be the easiest way?
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 2:53 PM, James Carman
jcar...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
Ok, so how do I resume a conversation using OWB? Suppose I know (via
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-340?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12851546#action_12851546
]
James Carman commented on OWB-340:
--
What if I'm not calling produce
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-340?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12851550#action_12851550
]
James Carman commented on OWB-340:
--
My patch does that. However, it doesn't propagate a very
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-340?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12850739#action_12850739
]
James Carman commented on OWB-340:
--
The point is that it's not necessarily a problem. What
: Injection and Lookup
Affects Versions: 1.0.0, M4
Reporter: James Carman
Assignee: James Carman
I've got an inject method for injecting non-contextual objects:
@SuppressWarnings(unchecked)
public T void inject(T instance)
{
BeanManager mgr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-339?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12850528#action_12850528
]
James Carman commented on OWB-339:
--
I tried committing this stuff myself, but apparently I'm
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-339?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
James Carman updated OWB-339:
-
Attachment: OWB-339.patch
Here's a patch that fixes it for my test case.
Injecting Non-Contextual Beans
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-340?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
James Carman updated OWB-340:
-
Attachment: OWB-340.patch
Here's a patch that gets rid of the immediate exceptions for when
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-310
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 6:44 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
yes, very good point Sven, thanks!
In fact this is a left over from the times the configuration was still
heavily based on XML. We should definitely get rid of this
-1 to #3, why re-invent the wheel? It's more code that you have to
implement, test, maintain, and enhance.
+1 to #2 and SLF4J
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 2:11 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu
cgurkanerdo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi;
Last couple of days there were some good discussion on how to proceed with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-300?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12837814#action_12837814
]
James Carman commented on OWB-300:
--
So, use SLF4J. Some folks don't like (including myself
from the hardcoded javassist dependency, thus
integration into any kind of EE Application Server would really leverage from
it!
Btw, thanks again for helping us on that, James!
LieGrue,
strub
--- James Carman jcar...@carmanconsulting.com schrieb am Di, 23.2.2010:
Von: James Carman jcar
17 matches
Mail list logo
