[jira] Created: (OWB-522) Missing updateTimeout in one of begin methods for conversation

Missing updateTimeout in one of begin methods for conversation -- Key: OWB-522 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-522 Project: OpenWebBeans Issue Type: Bug

[jira] Commented: (OWB-514) Leak in ELContextStore

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-514?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12978849#action_12978849 ] YING WANG commented on OWB-514: --- Hi Gurkan, I have some troube to locate

[jira] Created: (OWB-508) Dependent scope proxies are needed to wrap the build-in beans returned from the services if they are not serializable yet

Dependent scope proxies are needed to wrap the build-in beans returned from the services if they are not serializable yet - Key: OWB-508 URL:

[jira] Closed: (OWB-448) More changes for decorator and interceptor passivation support

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-448?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] YING WANG closed OWB-448. - Resolution: Fixed There is a limitation that abstract decorator passivation still not works. It is because that we

[jira] Created: (OWB-452) set active flag to false then context is destroyed

set active flag to false then context is destroyed -- Key: OWB-452 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-452 Project: OpenWebBeans Issue Type: Bug Components: Context and

[jira] Created: (OWB-448) More changes for decorator and interceptor passivation support

More changes for decorator and interceptor passivation support -- Key: OWB-448 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-448 Project: OpenWebBeans Issue Type: Improvement

[jira] Commented: (OWB-435) What is the expected result for following 2 decorators?

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-435?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12897944#action_12897944 ] YING WANG commented on OWB-435: --- I know we did not break the spec ;) But If I am a user who is

[jira] Commented: (OWB-435) What is the expected result for following 2 decorators?

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-435?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12898037#action_12898037 ] YING WANG commented on OWB-435: --- Two more questions, 1. My UserBean is a session scope bean

[jira] Updated: (OWB-385) implement passivation of managed beans in ServletContextListener

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-385?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] YING WANG updated OWB-385: -- Attachment: owb-385-2.patch Sorry, fogot checkstyle. the second patch fixed CS issues and 2 minor bugs in the

[jira] Updated: (OWB-385) implement passivation of managed beans in ServletContextListener

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-385?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] YING WANG updated OWB-385: -- Attachment: owb-385-1.patch Hi Guys, please review the changes under this bug. Basic failover /passivation

[jira] Assigned: (OWB-385) implement passivation of managed beans in ServletContextListener

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-385?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] YING WANG reassigned OWB-385: - Assignee: YING WANG (was: Gurkan Erdogdu) implement passivation of managed beans in

[jira] Commented: (OWB-399) Proxy objects could not be correctly deserialized by using javassist 3.11. we need to update to 3.12

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12880197#action_12880197 ] YING WANG commented on OWB-399: --- Thanks a lot , Mark. Proxy objects could not be correctly

[jira] Created: (OWB-399) Proxy objects could not be correctly deserialized by using javassist 3.11. we need to update to 3.12

Proxy objects could not be correctly deserialized by using javassist 3.11. we need to update to 3.12 Key: OWB-399 URL:

[jira] Created: (OWB-394) Any idea why our BeforeBeanDiscovery.addInterceptorBinding() has different signature?

Any idea why our BeforeBeanDiscovery.addInterceptorBinding() has different signature? - Key: OWB-394 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-394 Project:

[jira] Closed: (OWB-369) Static ContextsService in ContextFactory causes wrong webContextService used for multiple applications

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-369?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] YING WANG closed OWB-369. - Resolution: Fixed Static ContextsService in ContextFactory causes wrong webContextService used for multiple

[jira] Created: (OWB-370) Intransient Conversation context get rdestroyed randomly by destroyWithRespectToTimout

Intransient Conversation context get rdestroyed randomly by destroyWithRespectToTimout -- Key: OWB-370 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-370 Project:

[jira] Closed: (OWB-370) Intransient Conversation context get rdestroyed randomly by destroyWithRespectToTimout

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-370?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] YING WANG closed OWB-370. - Resolution: Fixed Intransient Conversation context get rdestroyed randomly by destroyWithRespectToTimout

[jira] Reopened: (OWB-369) Static ContextsService in ContextFactory causes wrong webContextService used for multiple applications

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-369?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] YING WANG reopened OWB-369: --- Assignee: YING WANG (was: Gurkan Erdogdu) Still randomly see different conversationManagers invoked for same

[jira] Updated: (OWB-369) Static ContextsService in ContextFactory causes wrong webContextService used for multiple applications

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-369?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] YING WANG updated OWB-369: -- Attachment: ContextFactory.patch Thanks Gurkan, Joe. With Gurkan's recent changes, my second app still fails.

[jira] Closed: (OWB-366) ContextNotActiveException fired from AppScope/NormalScopedBeanInterceptorHandler when a proxied object finalized

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-366?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] YING WANG closed OWB-366. - Fix Version/s: 1.0.0 Resolution: Fixed ContextNotActiveException fired from

[jira] Commented: (OWB-363) Intermittent bug with ApplicationScope disposers not being called

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-363?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12861834#action_12861834 ] YING WANG commented on OWB-363: --- Gurkan, Joe, I took a look on the latest change. It could fix

[jira] Assigned: (OWB-312) Add dopriv's to allow OWB to function with java 2 security enabled

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] YING WANG reassigned OWB-312: - Assignee: YING WANG (was: Gurkan Erdogdu) Add dopriv's to allow OWB to function with java 2 security

[jira] Created: (OWB-334) cid is missing when using redirect for a jsf 2.0 application

cid is missing when using redirect for a jsf 2.0 application Key: OWB-334 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-334 Project: OpenWebBeans Issue Type: Bug

[jira] Updated: (OWB-321) Conversation beans could not be populated to non-faces request by a JSF redirect navigation rule

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-321?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] YING WANG updated OWB-321: -- Attachment: owb321.patch Could someone help review my change? Thanks in advance. Conversation beans could not

[jira] Commented: (OWB-321) Conversation beans could not be populated to non-faces request by a JSF redirect navigation rule

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-321?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12844204#action_12844204 ] YING WANG commented on OWB-321: --- Thanks a lot Gurkan for clarifying. I must be tooo focus on the

[jira] Commented: (OWB-321) Conversation beans could not be populated to non-faces request by a JSF redirect navigation rule

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-321?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12843741#action_12843741 ] YING WANG commented on OWB-321: --- Thanks Sven for the info, I tested again, the reirect just

[jira] Commented: (OWB-289) Owb return 2 beans for Indirect specialized producer beans

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-289?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12839861#action_12839861 ] YING WANG commented on OWB-289: --- I would presume the exact being-extended method in the super

[jira] Created: (OWB-308) minor clean up on specialization code path

minor clean up on specialization code path -- Key: OWB-308 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-308 Project: OpenWebBeans Issue Type: Bug Components: Injection and Lookup

[jira] Updated: (OWB-308) minor clean up on specialization code path

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] YING WANG updated OWB-308: -- Attachment: 308.patch upload patch. minor clean up on specialization code path

[jira] Updated: (OWB-289) Owb return 2 beans for Indirect specialized producer beans

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-289?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] YING WANG updated OWB-289: -- Attachment: owb289.test.jar owb289.patch I think the bug might be mis-closed. Please review the

[jira] Updated: (OWB-273) Given class is not annotated with @Alternative Exception when try to enable alternative producer/producer field beans

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-273?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] YING WANG updated OWB-273: -- Attachment: alternative2.jar test cases around alternative/producer/disposes. Given class is not annotated with

[jira] Commented: (OWB-273) Given class is not annotated with @Alternative Exception when try to enable alternative producer/producer field beans

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-273?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12832062#action_12832062 ] YING WANG commented on OWB-273: --- Thanks a lot, Gurkan. So the only way to enable an alternative

[jira] Commented: (OWB-273) Given class is not annotated with @Alternative Exception when try to enable alternative producer/producer field beans

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-273?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12831508#action_12831508 ] YING WANG commented on OWB-273: --- hmm. I am thinking, if a class itself is annotated with

[jira] Created: (OWB-273) Given class is not annotated with @Alternative Exception when try to enable alternative producer/producer field beans

Given class is not annotated with @Alternative Exception when try to enable alternative producer/producer field beans - Key: OWB-273 URL:

[jira] Updated: (OWB-244) OWB injects a new object for @disposes injection point for dependent scope

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-244?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] YING WANG updated OWB-244: -- Attachment: dispose2.jar test code for dependent and request scope @disposes OWB injects a new object for