Re: getting rid of the weak version number ?

There will no M5, next version is 1.0.0 2010/3/14 Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org Hi, since over a year the trunk is labeled as 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT. While the release are (luckly) get some love of version numbering, I wonder when the trunk will feel the same love for good version numbers?

Re: getting rid of the weak version number ?

ah, now it all suddenly makes sense ;-) Thanks for explaining! -Matthias On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 4:41 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu cgurkanerdo...@gmail.com wrote: There will no M5, next version is 1.0.0 2010/3/14 Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org Hi, since over a year the trunk is labeled as

getting rid of the weak version number ?

Hi, since over a year the trunk is labeled as 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT. While the release are (luckly) get some love of version numbering, I wonder when the trunk will feel the same love for good version numbers? What's the deal with continuing with 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT ? Why not 1.0.0-M5-SNAPSHOT ? That's a

Re: getting rid of the weak version number ?

+1, plan sounds lovely. ;-) /JK 2010/3/14 Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org Hi, since over a year the trunk is labeled as 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT. While the release are (luckly) get some love of version numbering, I wonder when the trunk will feel the same love for good version numbers?

Re: getting rid of the weak version number ?

Oops, pressed send too fast. @Matzew: We do the same thing at MyFaces. Maybe suggest the same thing there? /JK 2010/3/14 Jan-Kees van Andel jankeesvanan...@gmail.com +1, plan sounds lovely. ;-) /JK 2010/3/14 Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org Hi, since over a year the trunk is