Reminder: Join us! Apache OpenWhisk “Tech. Interchange” (bi-weekly) Zoom Meeting

2017-10-10 Thread Tyson Norris
Hi - Please let me know if you have agenda items for the bi-weekly call tomorrow. (Matt, I assume it is OK to use the same zoom.us meeting info as before?) Thanks! Tyson Join us! Apache OpenWhisk “Tech. Interchange” (bi-weekly) Zoom Meeting Time: Wed., October 10th, 11am US E

Re: Invoker activation queueing proposal

2017-10-10 Thread Markus Thömmes
Heyho, I ran into the same issue before and I think our scheduling code should be an Actor. We could microbenchmark it to assure it can happily schedule a large amount of actions per second to not become a bottleneck. +1 for actorizing the LB Cheers, Markus Von meinem iPhone gesendet > Am 10

Re: Invoker activation queueing proposal

2017-10-10 Thread Tyson Norris
Hi - Following up on this, I’ve been working on a PR. One issue I’ve run into (which may be problematic in other scheduling scenarios) is that the scheduling in LoadBalancerService doesn’t respect the new async nature of activation counting in LoadBalancerData. At least I think this is a good