[DISCUSS] release openwhisk CLI

I have reviewed the the CLI related repos listed below and think we should delay release of the CLI until the following PRs/issues are addressed. If you've contributed to one of these CLI related repos please take a moment to read this and if you can help, it is much appreciated. Does anyone else

Re: [DISCUSS] release openwhisk runtimes

I believe the incubator-openwhisk-runtime-dotnet is good to go. Happy Thursday!Shawn On Thursday, February 21, 2019, 11:20:34 AM CST, Rodric Rabbah wrote: If you've contributed to one of these runtime repos please take a moment to read this and also review the runtime repo that you've w

Re: [DISCUSS] release openwhisk runtimes

Hi, I want to update the PHP versions to the latest (see PR 53 [1]). Other than that, the PHP runtime is good to go. Regards, Rob [1]: https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-runtime-php/pull/53 > On 21 Feb 2019, at 1

[DISCUSS] release openwhisk runtimes

If you've contributed to one of these runtime repos please take a moment to read this and also review the runtime repo that you've worked on. Do you (or anyone) have any reason to delay a release of the following runtime repositories as in, for example, are there any outstanding pull requests and

Re: archiving our slack history

I think the 1 (daily) digest per channel is nice in that I missed an exchange for wskdeploy where I think I had a helpful comment to offer. This might have been lost on me if the digests for all the channels were combined. On most days we have just one digest for the general channel which is where

Re: Notes + Video posted from today's OW Tech. Int. call

Added SlideShare link to the slides shown for the Knative topic on the Meeting Notes. Here it is as well: https://www.slideshare.net/MatthewRutkowski/knative-build-for-open-whisk-runtimes-phase-1-20180220 -MR On 2019/02/20 17:50:00, "Matt Rutkowski" wrote: > Thanks James for an excellent job