Re: Passing action instance to ContainerFactory (#4595)

2019-09-06 Thread Chetan Mehrotra
> One question is, is that intended to delegate action creation to the external > system as well Its more about invocation. Creation would be handled in a different way (say via db change feed based service). What a LambdaContainerFactory needs is some of the metadata about the action like FQN, v

Re: Passing action instance to ContainerFactory (#4595)

2019-09-06 Thread Dominic Kim
Got it. Thank you for the details. Best 2019년 9월 6일 (금) 오후 5:02, Chetan Mehrotra 님이 작성: > > One question is, is that intended to delegate action creation to the > external system as well > > Its more about invocation. Creation would be handled in a different > way (say via db change feed based s

[slack-digest] [2019-09-05] #general

2019-09-06 Thread OpenWhisk Team Slack
2019-09-05 08:54:58 UTC - Sven Lange-Last: @Ahmet Uyar does your installation use runc directly to pause / resume containers? we introduced using runc for pause / resume instead of docker pause / unpause because the operation runs faster with runc. the downside of this shortcut is that you can n

factoring out the name of the subjects view

2019-09-06 Thread Rodric Rabbah
Hello. At some point in the past, we factored out the couch view names for actions and activations but not subjects. The subjects view name is hard coded in the code and not versioned. This makes it difficult to change that view. The view name should be factored into the db config object. I create

Re: Can we adjust the time for the community call

2019-09-06 Thread Dascalita Dragos
I'm PST but I'm ok with 7AM PST. I've been fighting to reschedule early meetings in order to join OW community calls many times; moving it 1 hr early would allow me to participate too. On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 6:51 PM Dominic Kim wrote: > Thank you all for the warm words. > > Actually, 1 hour earl

RE: Allow decision about action result inclusion in logs on a per call basis

2019-09-06 Thread Ruediger Maass
Ok, I see the problem. I'll ty to make it more clear: - with "action log" I mean the output of action invocations that is logged for the users (stored in the userlogs-.log files of the invokers and controllers (for action sequences) - with "activation json" I mean the json document for an a

Re: Allow decision about action result inclusion in logs on a per call basis

2019-09-06 Thread Ruediger Maass
corrected the subject of this email, sorry about this. From: Ruediger Maass/Germany/IBM To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org Date: 06/09/2019 19:18 Subject:Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Allow decision about action result inclusion in logs on a per call basis Ok, I see the problem. I'll ty to ma

Re: Allow decision about action result inclusion in logs on a per call basis

2019-09-06 Thread Tyson Norris
A couple questions: * " Action results may contain sensible data that should not be logged." - I don't think this solves that problem, correct? E.g. the result or error could have sensitive data still, right? Since this is generated based on the user code and that code's error messages which may