+1 – and thanks to @purplecabbage for the patch!
From: Rob Allen
Date: Friday, December 31, 2021 at 6:09 AM
To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk Client Js (v3.21.6, rc1)
+1 to release Apache OpenWhisk Client Js (v3.21.6, rc1)
Checked with rcverify.sh
Looking at some of our internal documentation seems like we are looking to move
towards Azul Zulu[0] for our JRE/JDK. Any have any experience with this or know
if its license is compatible with Apache projects?
-d
[0] -
https://www.azul.com/downloads/zulu-community/?=x86-64-bit=jdk
On
st regards
Dominic
2020년 1월 30일 (목) 오전 10:28, dan McWeeney 님이 작성:
> I hosted the last Interchange call but we didn’t get a new host for the
> upcoming one, is there someone that would like to volunteer. I am not
> around on Weds Feb 5th to host again.
>
> Thanks!
>
> -d
>
>
I hosted the last Interchange call but we didn’t get a new host for the
upcoming one, is there someone that would like to volunteer. I am not around on
Weds Feb 5th to host again.
Thanks!
-d
Hey all
I will be hosting the biweekly Tech Interchange call on Weds, Jan 22 at
10am Eastern, 7am Pacific, 3pm Central Europe, 2pm GMT,10pm Beijing,
and 11pm Seoul.
Please reply back with topics you'd like to see covered!
Meeting link: http://zoom.us/my/asfopenwhisk
-d
Sorry I had forgotten to send out a reminder late last week about the
Interchange, which in turn contrbuted to a very small ( two person )
meeting. Justin and I had a lovely chat but, not about anything
OpenWhisk related. So we cut it short and resolved to try again in two
weeks.
I volunteer to
Welcome Shawn and Congrats.
On 12/3/19, 10:00 AM, "Matt Rutkowski" wrote:
Welcome Shawn!
Kind regards,
Matt
From: Rob Allen
To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org
Date: 12/03/2019 01:24 AM
Subject:[EXTERNAL] Re: Welcome new Committer Shawn
We have had some questions from users around how default parameters (action and
package) are or are not encrypted at rest and as they move through the system.
Today they are obviously not being encrypted and that has been an impediment to
adoption for certain use cases ( especially web actions
I have proposed a PR[0] to change the behavior of the container proxy when an
action container produces a response large enough to be truncated. The change
is to leave the container running instead of killing it and most people seem to
agree that's a fine idea.
This PR prompted an
There has been talk previously about moving to later java and scala versions.
I’ve got this all working in a PR[0], which passes travis. I was wondering if
there is some further testing that people think should be done.
-dan
[0] - https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/pull/4706
A reminder that the Tech Interchange is today.
Details:
What: Apache OpenWhisk "Tech. Interchange" (bi-weekly) Zoom Meeting
When: @ 11:00am EDT, 8am PDT, 3pm GMT, 5pm CEST , 3pm UTC
“Location”: https://zoom.us/my/asfopenwhisk
The agenda is currently:
- Introduction of new attendees
- Asking
Besides the normal agenda:
- Introduction/New faces on the call?
- Asking around for notable changes/updates?
- Find and confirm moderator for next meeting Feb 14th
Does anyone have any updates they’d like to talk about?
Thanks!
-d
12 matches
Mail list logo
