On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 8:37 PM David P Grove wrote:
> ...I don't think
> building the jar actually requires much more software on your machine than
> what is required to successfully run the jar, so the gap may be small...
And if there's a significant gap, a Docker image with build tools can hel
Carlos Santana wrote on 11/13/2019 01:30:31 PM:
>
> Yes that’s fine to be “alongside” with the release, but I would not
> want to wait months for another release just get a minor update to the
jar
>
> I would prefer in addition to have a nightly jar built and easy to get.
>
We might be on bette
Yes that’s fine to be “alongside” with the release, but I would not want to
wait months for another release just get a minor update to the jar
I would prefer in addition to have a nightly jar built and easy to get.
- Carlos Santana
@csantanapr
> On Nov 13, 2019, at 9:09 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 3:02 PM Carlos Santana wrote:
> ...The jar can’t and should not be distributed as part of an Apache release...
It won't be an Apache Release but it's fine to distribute that jar as
a "compiled package" [1] alongside its released source code.
-Bertrand
[1] http://www.apac
suggest to distribute at least the precompiled jar instead of requiring to
> compile by himself.
> >
> > --
> > Michele Sciabarra
> > mich...@sciabarra.com
> >
> > ----- Original message -----
> > From: Chetan Mehrotra
> > To: dev@openwhisk.
precompiled jar instead of requiring to compile by
> himself.
>
> --
> Michele Sciabarra
> mich...@sciabarra.com
>
> - Original message -
> From: Chetan Mehrotra
> To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org
> Subject: Re: OpenWhisk as a single docker image?
> Date: W
- Original message -
From: Chetan Mehrotra
To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org
Subject: Re: OpenWhisk as a single docker image?
Date: Wednesday, November 13, 2019 6:00 AM
Running standalone logic within a Docker would be tricky as there is quite
a bit of logic involved to use the right IP for inter docker
cker run -p 8080:8080
> openwhisk/standalone" and enjoy...
> >
> > If it is possible I can volounteer to write the dockerfile do that...
> >
> > I have a question: does it use the local docker? Where is the
> invoker?
> >
> >
> > --
&g
have a question: does it use the local docker? Where is the invoker?
>
>
> --
> Michele Sciabarra
> mich...@sciabarra.com
>
> ----- Original message -
> From: Rodric Rabbah
> To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org
> Subject: Re: OpenWhisk
it use the local docker? Where is the invoker?
--
Michele Sciabarra
mich...@sciabarra.com
- Original message -
From: Rodric Rabbah
To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org
Subject: Re: OpenWhisk as a single docker image?
Date: Saturday, November 09
n: does it use the local docker? Where is the invoker?
--
Michele Sciabarra
mich...@sciabarra.com
- Original message -
From: Rodric Rabbah
To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org
Subject: Re: OpenWhisk as a single docker image?
Date: Saturday, November 09, 2019 2:31 PM
Do you mean the
Do you mean the standalone controller?
https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/blob/master/core/standalone/README.md
-r
> On Nov 9, 2019, at 8:18 AM, Michele Sciabarra wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> I remember the discussion about the openwhisk as a single executable that
> includes also Kafka. So
12 matches
Mail list logo