dongjoon-hyun commented on pull request #520:
URL: https://github.com/apache/orc/pull/520#issuecomment-659898636
Could you review this please, @omalley and @jcamachor ?
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service
dongjoon-hyun opened a new pull request #520:
URL: https://github.com/apache/orc/pull/520
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to
Dongjoon Hyun created ORC-648:
-
Summary: Add GitHub Action for Java8/Java11 test
Key: ORC-648
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ORC-648
Project: ORC
Issue Type: Test
Components
dongjoon-hyun commented on pull request #517:
URL: https://github.com/apache/orc/pull/517#issuecomment-659831415
For this PR, ORC-647 added macOS 10.15 test to Travis CI with `clang12`.
Could you rebase this PR to the master?
```
$ clang --version
90Apple clang version 12.0.0 (
dongjoon-hyun commented on pull request #519:
URL: https://github.com/apache/orc/pull/519#issuecomment-659824927
For a record, this is merged according to the +1 at ORC-647 comment.
This is an automated message from the Apach
dongjoon-hyun merged pull request #519:
URL: https://github.com/apache/orc/pull/519
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
Maybe, you can get more feedbacks and help on d...@nifi.apache.org for that
code pach. ;)
On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 1:27 PM Ryan Schachte
wrote:
> Hey Matt,
> I'm exploring the NiFi code and I feel I'm really close. This code will
> probably work great for me, but I'm getting a failure because it
Hey Matt,
I'm exploring the NiFi code and I feel I'm really close. This code will
probably work great for me, but I'm getting a failure because it's seeing a
TypeInfo struct once I delegate the code to:
row[i] = OrcUtils.convertToORCObject(OrcUtils.getOrcField(fieldSchema), o);
*Java Code:*
> Sch
dongjoon-hyun commented on pull request #519:
URL: https://github.com/apache/orc/pull/519#issuecomment-659570078
Hi, @jcamachor and @prasanthj .
Could you review this PR when you have some time?
This is an automated messag
